• Home
    • Introduction
  • About
  • Services
    • Records available for consultation
    • Tours & Workshops
  • Blogs
    • "Bitesize" Blog >
      • Picks from the Past
    • Projects >
      • Berwick 900
      • One Place Study - Norham >
        • Norham Links
      • Kerchesters, Sprouston
  • Contact Us
    • Sign up to Newsletter
    • Power Hour & Workshop Enquiries
    • Privacy Policy
  • #AncestryHour
BORDERS ANCESTRY
  • Home
    • Introduction
  • About
  • Services
    • Records available for consultation
    • Tours & Workshops
  • Blogs
    • "Bitesize" Blog >
      • Picks from the Past
    • Projects >
      • Berwick 900
      • One Place Study - Norham >
        • Norham Links
      • Kerchesters, Sprouston
  • Contact Us
    • Sign up to Newsletter
    • Power Hour & Workshop Enquiries
    • Privacy Policy
  • #AncestryHour

Border Ramblings

Pearcey Per Se

29/8/2020

4 Comments

 

The Pearcy family of ‘Glendale’ Northumberland & the value of Probate Inventories to the Family Historian

​This month I would like to introduce you to David Pearcy one of my highly valued, longstanding customers.  Rather than jumping all in and selecting a one-off research and report commission, David has joined the increasing number of folks who elect to pay a manageable sum each month to uncover a new aspect of their family history in bitesize chunks.  Not only does this make researching his family history more affordable, it means it is a constantly evolving story.  As we all know family history is NEVER done and during this extraordinary period of restricted movement it means, in some small way, David has had a new discovery or snippet of information to look forward to each month.
​Rather than focusing on one particular line or individual, David is all encompassing in his approach to family history and whilst like most of us he has more questions concerning a specific individual or branch, he is looking for the whole story.  Whilst always having had an active interest in his family’s history, it began in earnest following the passing of his mother and the re-discovery of her own meticulous research that contained several ancestor mysteries.  
Picture  Andrew Pearcy born 1848 at the  Angel Inn, Wooler.
Andrew Pearcy born 1848 at the Angel Inn, Wooler.
​As part of his journey of discovery, David’s budget this month has taken advantage of a discounted Y-DNA test (available through Family Tree DNA until 31st August) to support (and hopefully enhance) his investigations into his patrilineal ‘Pearcy’ line.  As readers of my blogs will know, the Y chromosome is carried, passed on and inherited exclusively by men, meaning they are the only ones who can take a Y-DNA test.  (Ladies, do not despair, as due to the way Y-DNA recombines, testing a male cousin or uncle can be just as effective as testing a father or brother, just so long as they are from the same patrilineal (father) line.)  
​David had already tested his autosomal DNA with Ancestry before he sought me out and through his matches had connected with a distant cousin compiling a family history about early members of the family.  As is always the case, however, like the A1 which traverses Northumberland, there is one heck of a lot more to discover if the time is taken to leave the trunk road and explore! 
​Legends abound concerning the origins of the Pearcy/Piercy family of Northumberland not to mention its wider potential connections!  (A quick reminder here that the line of decent of the current incumbents of the title Duke of Northumberland although ancient has twice passed through the female line.   If planning to use Y-DNA to explore links to these ‘Percys’ do please bear this in mind!) Refreshingly, David is not interested in investigating potential connections to illustrious personages but keen to delve deeper into his own historical origins – whatever they may be!

​Confirmed Pearcy Ancestors

​By the turn of the nineteenth century David’s Pearcy ancestors were firmly established in the ‘Glendale’ area of Northumberland, and indications are that they had been for some time previous.  David’s 4th great grandfather was almost certainly a John Pearcy, in this instance spelled Piercy, who died at Nesbit Buildings aged 87 in 1829 and buried at Doddington on 1st September.  In 1778 John Pearcy [Percy] had married a Mary Smith on 17th May at Doddington.  In August the following year David’s 3rd great grandfather ‘Roger son to John Pearcy by his wife Mary, Doddington, was born 28 August 1779’ and baptised at Wooler West Street Presbyterian Chapel on 4th September.  
Picture  Andrew Pearcy b. 1848, Wooler with his wife Margaret Turnbull and five of their children.  David's grandfather 'Jack' Pearcy b.1885 is on the back row extreme right.
Andrew Pearcy b. 1848, Wooler with his wife Margaret Turnbull and five of their children. David's grandfather 'Jack' Pearcy b.1885 is on the back row extreme right.
​Mary ‘wife to John Percy [sic] died at Nesbit Buildings’ aged 69 in 1819 and was buried at Doddington on 11th July.  In addition to Roger, David’s 3rd great grandfather it appears the couple had a further six children, the youngest of which, ‘Gilbert son of John Pearcy and Mary his wife Doddington Greens, born 7th September’ was baptised at West Chapel, Presbyterian Chapel Wooler on 9th September 1792.  This name of this youngest son may prove to be a significant key in unravelling earlier generations of the family.
Picture  Extract from the Bible belonging to the Pearcy Family of the Angel Inn Wooler.
Extract from the Bible belonging to the Pearcy Family of the Angel Inn Wooler.
​David’s 2nd great grandfather Stephen Pearcy who was born at Fenwick in August in 1815 became the Landlord at the Angel Inn on Wooler High Street, where he died in May 1855.  After Stephen’s death his widow Mary Cock, whose family also had longstanding connections with Doddington and the ‘Cock Inn’, returned to the village and lived as housekeeper to her brother until her death at the Mill House in 1884.  David has a fascinating collection of photographs and pub memorabilia dating from his family’s time at the Angel.  
​Subsequent generations of the Pearcy family followed the path taken by so many living in the rural communities of North Northumberland who headed south to the towns where the advent of the railway and the County’s deep mines afforded employment for skilled joiners and other craft trades.  His grandfather ‘Jack’ Pearcy was the last of the line to have been born at Doddington on 7th May 1885.  

Earlier Pearcy Family Groups

​The earlier generations of the Pearcy family are more challenging to unravel, not least as there are a few of them, but also by a lack of evidence to ‘glue’ them together.  By the late eighteenth century, distinct family groups are evident in the areas around Norham (Horncliffe), and Ford as well as Doddington, Wooler and Kirknewton.  Do these groups all descend from a common Pearcy ancestor?  Naming patterns and geographic locality would suggest a degree of familial connection exists but at what genetic distance?  This is just one of the questions being posed and to which David’s Y-DNA may just hold some answers. 
Picture
Margaret Cock, wife of Stephen Pearcy of the Angel Inn Wooler. Following her husband's death she returned to Doddington where she lived as housekeeper to her brother at Doddington Mill House, and where she died in 1884.
​The earliest vital event noted in north Northumberland parish registers is the marriage of Robert Pearsey [sic] to Francis Salmond at Berwick in Dec 1584.  Outside of Berwick, the earliest parish register entry found to date is for the burial of a Thomas Piercy of Catfordlaw [Hay Farm] at Ford in January 1692/3.  Relatively close on its heels is the baptism of a Gilbert Persey [sic] at Carham in June 1704.  A badly worn memorial headstone at Kirknewton dating from circa 1759 provides early evidence of Pearcy links and the Christian name Gilbert with Doddington [Dorinton].
From his age of 87 recorded at burial in 1829, a year of birth for David’s 4th great grandfather, John Pearcy, can be estimated as 1742.  A possibility for David’s 5th or even 6th great grandfather is a Roger Pearcy of Ewart, an historic township of Doddington, who married a Margaret Scot at Doddington in June 1713, but to date there is insufficient evidence to prove any relationship beyond doubt.  There is also a possible burial record for Roger in 1724 which would rule him out. 
​There are other potential candidates in a William Pearcy of Hazlerigg baptising children at Doddington in 1709, and a John Pearcy of Downam (Cornhill) the father of a Gilbert baptised at Carham in 1704, although from the dates these too may be from an earlier generation.  Given the prevalence of the name Gilbert throughout, however, this particular family branch cannot be overlooked.  It is thought highly likely that Roger, William and John were related, if not brothers, then perhaps cousins. A Gilbert Pearcy born circa 1727, calculated from the age recorded at his burial in Doddington in 1815, was likely to have been another close relative.  Gilbert certainly had close ties to Doddington and appears to have been married at least twice if not three times.

Inventory of Gilbert Pearcie of Thom[p]sons Walls, 1687

The discovery of an administration bond and inventory for a Gilbert Pearcie of Thomsons Walls near Kirknewton dating from 1687 is therefore potentially relevant to the investigation.  Where they have survived, Inventories are veritable gems of information and tell us so much about farm livestock levels and land use, in this case of an upland and semi-upland farm during the relevant period.[1]  As some folks will know this is another interest of mine, especially its capabilities and limitations of feeding an army, as in 1513.  This single page of text does not disappoint.​
Picture  Probate Inventory for Gilbert Pearcy of Thompsons Walls, Kirknewton, Northumberland dated 1687
Probate Inventory for Gilbert Pearcy of Thompsons Walls, Kirknewton, Northumberland dated 1687
​Sadly, the admin bond itself is unavailable online or to order which is unfortunate but as admin bonds are generally of limited genealogical value, not a disaster.  Due to the nature of many of the pre 1695 Will Bonds it cannot be photocopied and is only available to view on site.  However, as the inventory contains an amount owed for sheep, it would perhaps suggest that a relative, brother, cousin, son or nephew named Andrew Pearcy was also farming in the vicinity.  Although not as distinctive a name as Gilbert,  Andrew also features in David’s line of decent, indeed it was the Christian name of his Great Grandfather who was born at the Angel Inn at Wooler the 16th November 1848.

Inventory of Thomas Mewres of Thom[p]sons Walls, 1683

Interestingly, the 1683 Inventory of Thomas Mewres also of Thomsons Walls is also available online.  It would appear he was possibly farming a larger area and carrying more stock.  It also shows a figure for £50, an equivalent of £5722.49 as at 2017 was owing to the deceased although it does not state by whom. [2] Is it perhaps the opposite entry to the debt which appears, and was still owing by Gilbert Pearcy in 1687?
Picture  Probate Inventory for Thomas Mewres [sic] of Thompsons Walls, Kirknewton, Northumberland dated 1683
Probate Inventory for Thomas Mewres [sic] of Thompsons Walls, Kirknewton, Northumberland dated 1683
​It is interesting to note that whilst the probate valuation undertaken in April 1687 for Gilbert Pearcy includes a figure for crops in the ground, the valuation of October 1683 does not.  Does this suggest that if autumn sowing formed part of the arable rotation it was yet to take place?   The autumn valuation for Thomas Mewres in 1683 with its larger quantities of Oats, Rye and Barley in store would suggest it was perhaps immediately post-harvest? There is a total absence of Wheat, which due to the nature of the land is to be expected.  
​It was also noted that this autumn valuation contained large quantities of cheese and butter.  Before the seventeenth century, cheese was largely made from ewe’s milk but by the time the probate was drafted it is thought the cheese would have been made from the milk from the five cows with calves at foot.  It is glimpses into the past like these that shed light on the staple foods that formed part of our ancestors’ diets.
Picture  Signature of George Smith of Horncliffe in 1788
Signature of George Smith of Horncliffe in 1788
Although not included here there are two further inventories and associated documents relating to the Mewres [Mures] family of Thom[p]sons Walls.  A George Mures dating from 1694, a Robert Mures from 1710 which also includes a Will.  He appears to have died unmarried and without issue as several nephews as nieces are named as beneficiaries.  A jump to Lowick and a George Muross [sic] sees my own 4th great grandfather George Smith of Horncliffe standing as administration guarantor.  If interested these can be found in the
​North East Inheritance Database
​Clearly it has only been possible to cover a small fraction of Pearcy research and associated evidence in just one blog.  The little snippets included here are designed to ‘pique’ the interest, illustrate the longevity of the Glendale connection and provide some general historical interest for non-Pearcy readers. 
Should your interest lie with the extended Pearcy pedigree, however, several lines of decent have to date been traced and followed to Howick, Alnwick and beyond.  The more folks that come forward with their own personal snippets of family knowledge and the more Pearcy/Piercy men that test their DNA, the more evidence will become available and meaningful conclusions can be drawn over time.  If this is you, or is of interest to you, then please do get in touch with us! 

​Notes to the Inventory transcriptions.  

Whilst the spellings are typically erratic, most of the language in the Inventories will be familiar, however, definitions have been provided for the more obscure words below:
Bigg
OED online.  A hardy variety of barley grown mainly in northern England and Scotland. Cf. bere n.1.
Now considered to be one of the cultivated varieties of Hordeum vulgare subsp. vulgare, this type of barley was previously known as H. tetrastichum because it appears to have four rows of grains in the ear.
barley-bigg, Scotch bigg: see the first elements.

Hoges/Hoggs 
'Hoges' here have been taken to mean sheep in their 2nd year of life.

Weather
A Wether/Weather/Wedder is a castrated male sheep.

Boll
OED Online.  A measure of capacity for grain, etc., used in Scotland and the north of England, containing in Scotland generally 6 imperial bushels, but in the north of England varying locally from the ‘old boll’ of 6 bushels to the ‘new boll’ of 2 bushels. Also a measure of weight, containing for flour 10 stone (= 140 pounds). (A very full table of its local values is given in Old Country & Farming Words (E.D.S. 1880) p. 168).  (NB. At the time of Flodden in 1513 there were 8 bushels of corn to the Quarter and 4 Quarters to the ton.)

Useful Links

[1] The publications of the Surtees Society are always worth consulting when looking for collections of early Wills & Inventories.  Some, such as, Wills and inventories illustrative of the history, manners, language, statistics, &c., of the northern counties of England, from the eleventh century downwards, are available online
http://www.surteessociety.org.uk/

​
[2] National Archives, Currency Convertor
​https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/currency-converter
4 Comments

History under the Hammer Part 2 & A Fifteen Minute Challenge!

12/7/2020

0 Comments

 
For the remainder of 2020 the monthly auctions at Railton’s saleroom in Wooler are set to be ‘double headers’ held over 2 days.  The forthcoming sale on 18th & 19th of July is once again packed full of historical treasures, each with a unique story to tell.  From beautifully delicate 18th century glasses with air twisted stems, to pewter tea sets that serve as reminders of a bygone occupation at its zenith in the late 17th century.   Early Inventories for inheritance and tax purposes invariably mention pewter plates and utensils too, so keep an eye open the next time you are delving into the records.  ​
Picture Railtons July Auction, Lot 365. An eighteenth century wine glass, the funnel shaped bowl engraved with vine frieze above a mercury multiple twist stem, raised on conical foot with rough pontil mark.
Lot 365. An eighteenth century wine glass, the funnel shaped bowl engraved with vine frieze above a mercury multiple twist stem, raised on conical foot with rough pontil mark.
​For two centuries from 1474 pewter was unrivalled as a material for plates, dishes, drinking vessels and similar ware. From the 16th century the indispensable preliminary for a Freeman setting up as a Master Pewterer and opening his own shop was to record his 'touch' or trade mark on large pewter sheets retained by the Company in the Hall. The early touch plates were lost in the Great Fire; the five that survive today record the marks of  Master Pewterers from then until the beginning of the 19th century when the Company no longer exercised the power to enforce this regulation. These plates provide a unique record of pewterers of the period containing over 1,000 individual marks and are of great historical value.[1]
Picture Railtons Auctions Lot 51. Six pieces of art nouveau hand-beaten pewter - teapot, jugs, stand, sucre etc.
Lot 51. Six pieces of art nouveau hand-beaten pewter - teapot, jugs, stand, sucre etc.
If you had a Pewterer Ancestor in the family is their individual mark amongst them?

The Worshipful Company of Pewterers dates from the medieval period, with the earliest documented reference dating from 1348.  The Guild ranks No 16 in the pecking order of over 100 City of London Livery Companies.  The Company’s website provides some fascinating historical background as well as the role of the Company today.  

The Fifteen Minute Challenge

As the current issue (August) of Family Tree Magazine features an interesting article on maps and where to find them it seems particularly fitting to focus on an item in the sale that is also cartographical in nature.  Lot No 160, a nineteenth century hand-coloured map of Brainshaugh fits the bill perfectly!  It is also possible to pinpoint the date of the map even further from one or two of its distinguishing features.
Picture Railtons Auctioneers Lot 16.  Nineteenth century handcoloured map of part of Guyzance Township, showing Brainshaugh
Lot 16. Nineteenth century handcoloured map of part of Guyzance Township, showing Brainshaugh
  • Areas of the map beyond the boundaries of the focal subject, likely part of Guyzance Township, are left blank.  This identifies it as part of an Old County Series map at a scale of 25 inches to a mile which were introduced from 1854, early copies of which were available hand coloured.  The focal area appears to be Brainshaugh Farm.
  • Handwritten notes in places refer to areas of land 'In old Grass in 1892'.
  • The map contains printed 3 digit parcel numbers but any parcel acreages have been added by hand.  Parcel Numbers, (which we know now as field numbers calculated from Ordnance Survey grid references), were historically allocated by the parish and date from the maps produced for the Tithe Commutations in 1834.  Before 1879 acreages and land use/cropping figures were recorded in a separate book, similar to the undated handwritten schedule on the map. [2] After the mid-1880s the books were scrapped and acreages printed on the maps instead.  
Picture Railtons Auctioneers Lot 160 Close up of Land Use Schedule.
Lot 160 Close up of Land Use Schedule.
Taking the above information into account the map can now be more accurately dated to between 1854 and the mid-1880s with a good degree of certainty, possibly favouring the earlier rather than later period due to presence of handcolouring.
​With this in hand I set myself a challenge – how much history could I actually unearth about Brainshaugh and its people in just 15 minutes?
Picture Railtons Auctions Lot 160. A nineteenth century handcoloured map of  Guyzance showing Brainshaugh Farm & Chapel
Lot 160. A nineteenth century handcoloured map of Guyzance showing Brainshaugh Farm & Chapel
​1.  Field names of High and Low Chapel Close and the remains of an ancient Chapel and burial ground betray a former religious connection.  A quick look on the Historic England Website confirms it is indeed a scheduled monument, entry number 1006579, first listed in 1932.  It also contains the following information.
Guyzance chapel was originally part of Guyzance, or Brainshaugh, Priory of St Wilfrid, which was founded between 1147-1152 by Richard Tison for Premonstratensian Canonesses. It is thought to have been abandoned at the time of the Black Death and later became a cell for the Premonstratensian Abbey at Alnwick. It was dissolved in 1539.
So, although it had previously fallen into disuse, the ‘Dissolution of the Monasteries’ likely provided the final nail in the coffin.  Not a bad starting date for the challenge of 1147!
​
Historic England also contains a record for Brainshaugh House, list no 1153504 first registered in 1969. 
House. Late C16 or early C17; south front remodelled in second quarter of C18; enlarged and given new west front 1805 for Thomas Cook. Squared stone, of near-ashlar quality in 1805 parts, except for rubble of east elevation and roughly-squared stone of east part of north elevation; cut dressings. Lakeland slate roof to main block; kitchen wing with pantiles except for asbestos sheets on east end; stacks rebuilt in brick on old bases. Main block formerly L-plan, enlarged to a square in 1805; kitchen wing to south- east.
2.  The North East Inheritance Database was the next port of call and provided a mighty haul of inhabitants for Brainshaugh covering several centuries.  
1597       Gray, Henrye                     Brainshaugh       yeoman               will, inventory
1597       Gray, Annes                       Brainshaugh                      
1672       Thompson, Arthure         Brainshaugh                                       inventory
1678       Osmonderley, Mary         Brainshaugh                                       will, inventory, bond
1706       Barker, Edward                 Brainshaugh                                       will, wrapper, will bond
1736       Davison, Thomas              Brainshaugh       yeoman                 will, will bond
1748       Cook, William                    Brainshaugh       gentleman            will
1769       Beall, Ralph                        Brainshaugh       yeoman                will
1775       Cook, Edward                    Brainshaugh        esquire                 will
1786       Tomling, Henry                 Brainshaugh       yeoman                 administration bond
1792       Cook, Thomas                   Brainshaugh       gentleman            administration bond
1792       Tate, Margaret                  Brainshaugh                                      administration bond
1814, 1815 Graham, Richard         Brainshaugh       farmer                   will, will bond
1786, 1824 Tomlin, Henry              Brainshaugh       yeoman                court docs/admin bond
1826       Robson, George               Brainshaugh       farmer                   will
1832       Tate, John                          Brainshaugh       esquire                 will
1834       Garrett, Benjamin            Brainshaugh       husbandman      will
1835       Grey, John                         Brainshaugh       husbandman      will, codicil
1837       Tate, Maria                        Brainshaugh                                     will
1841       Bell, William                      Brainshaugh       farmer                  will, affidavit
1843       Tate, John                          Brainshaugh       esquire                 administration bond
1856       Bolam, Robert                  Brainshaugh       farmer                  will, wrapper
The earliest entry of 1597 looks most interesting:

Henrye GRAY, husband of Annes Gray, yeoman, of Gisons (Guysone, Gyasings) within the parishe of Brainshaughe within the countye of Northumberlande [Brainshaugh, Northumberland]; also spelt Graye
Date of probate: 1597

The inventory includes the debts of Gray's wife, and was apprised upon her death: among the debts is a fee Gray's widow charged for cleansing the house after the plague, and with which disease it is likely Henrye Gray was infected when he died.


  • will, 1 August 1596 (DPR/I/1/1597/G8/1-2)
    Will, with list of debts owing to the testator of £1 11s. Endorsed: proved.
  • inventory, actual total £50 6s 6d (with account of debts of £3 7s 7d), 14 August 1597 (DPR/I/1/1597/G8/3-4)
    [joint] inventory of the goods etc. of Henrye Gray deceased [and of his wife, appraised] at the death of his wife Annes Gray; with list of debts owing by Annes Gray at the time of her death
​So it is now known the plague visited Brainshaugh on at least two occasions.  
Picture Wiki Commons: Brainshaugh Chapel by Lisa Jarvis
Wiki Commons: Lisa Jarvis / Brainshaugh Chapel
In terms of will makers, Brainshaugh and its immediate environs appears to have been dominated by three families, that of Grey, Cook and Tate.  No doubt the Wills of these and other individuals will shed more light on fortunes of Brainshaugh through the ages.
​3.  Moving into the later 19th century and heading towards the present day, a search of the census using search terms ‘Brainshaugh, Northumberland’ produced a staggering number of results.  Due to the 15 minute time constraint the search was refined using exact location and only the 1861 census was viewed. It returned 23 individuals.  
The Farm extended to 300 acres and was occupied by a Thomas Crossly from Berwick upon Tweed, Ann his Scottish born wife and 10 other members of their family, largely born in Berwick or Scotland with only youngest daughter aged 2 born at Brainshaugh suggesting the move there to have been relatively recent.

There were two further households at Brainshaugh, one, very possibly Brainshaugh House, consisting of three individuals, two named Mitcheson, a retired Merchant and his wife, and the third occupant their nephew by the name of Carss. 

The second household contained Thomas Dickson an Agricultural Labourer and eight members of his family, the youngest of which was likewise the only child to have been born at Guyzance.  Like the Farm House, the occupants of the two other properties were born in Scotland, Berwick upon Tweed or other parishes in north Northumberland, which may indicate they all came to Brainshaugh as a ‘job lot’.  Further research may even reveal a degree of relatedness perhaps?
4.  For Trade Directories a quick search of Kelly’s Directory for Northumberland for the year 1914 returned the following:
Picture  Extract from Kelly's Directory for Northumberland, 1914: Guyzance and Brainshaugh
Extract from Kelly's Directory for Northumberland, 1914: Guyzance and Brainshaugh
Picture
​This entry suggests the farm had not changed in size from the time of the 1861 census, but is slightly more that the hand written schedule on the map up for sale which totals 290.686 acres. (Note to self – a church service under a thorn tree sounds decidedly parky in winter.  It is hoped the vicar kept the sermon brief for the comfort of his congregation!)
5.  Moving forward to 1939 and the outbreak of WW2. Sadly an exact search of the 1939 Register returned a nil result and returns for within a 5 mile radius were too numerous to search in the allotted time. 
6.  ​An exact search of parish records using the term ‘Brainshaugh, Northumberland’ returned 47 results; 44 marriages, 2 death duty entries, including Maria Tate nee Bell whose Will is listed above, and one notice of a Death at Sea from Typhoid in WW2 for 17 year old Morris Gordon Robertson.
A quick Google returned the following for 1945, when 10 18 year old soldiers were tragically swept to their deaths in the River Coquet whilst on exercise. 
https://www.northumberlandarchives.com/2016/09/13/a-tragedy/
Picture Guyzance Tragedy Memorial 1945 John Sparshatt / Guyzance Tragedy Memorial / CC BY-SA 2.0
John Sparshatt / Guyzance Tragedy Memorial / CC BY-SA 2.0
​Out of time and still many more sources to search online such as Poll Books, Newspapers etc., but the above is not a bad haul for just 15 minutes of research! 
​
​A simple lot with an auction estimate of £80 - £120 has already revealed a wealth of information with no doubt much more to come with further digging.  It just goes to show how auction houses are priceless contributors to ‘Public History’ and by no means to be overlooked as respositories of historical sources.  I will be tuned into the Railtons auction next Saturday through the-salroom.com (where it is free to register) to watch the map go under the hammer at a safe social distance, it would be great if you could join me – who knows, I might even sneak in a cheeky bid! 
[1] The Worshipful Company of Pewterers 
https://www.pewterers.org.uk/history-of-the-company-and-hall

[2] National Library of Scotland. The Ordnance Survey Books of Reference (‘Area Books’, or ‘Parish Area Books’) published between 1855-1882 to accompany the Ordnance Survey’s 25 inch to the mile maps. Free download available here:
https://data.nls.uk/data/digitised-collections/os-books-of-reference/
0 Comments

History under the Hammer - sourcing local & family history memorabilia at auction.

20/6/2020

4 Comments

 
To be ignorant of what occurred before you were born is to remain always a child. For what is the worth of human life, unless it is woven into the life of our ancestors by the records of history.  (Cicero)
​The popularity of television shows such as The Antiques Roadshow and Flog It! demonstrate the public’s continued fascination with objects from bygone eras. The shocked amazement on owners faces when they are told the piece of ‘tat’ or ugly china that has been kept hidden from public view is worth a small fortune, will undoubtedly have sent many folk scurrying for stepladders and torch in order to examine the contents of the attic.   ‘Dust down your Granny and send her to auction if she is worth a bob or two’  has I am sure, crossed many a mind! 
Picture Railton's Saleroom in Wooler in preparation for June 2020 Auction
Railton's Saleroom in Wooler, Northumberland, preparing for the 27th June 2020 antiques sale.
​Although these shows include snippets about the object’s history, their primary focus tends to be the material worth rather than historical value.  The connection between objects being appraised or sold and our individual or collective past is rarely more than briefly considered.  Often the very items being offered for sale are those that a family historian would love to find and would never dream of parting with come hell or high water! 
​eBay has long been the online auction site of choice to hunt down family memorabilia, most usually in the form of old documents.  However, large numbers of the documents and manuscripts that find their way on to eBay have passed through a saleroom room beforehand.  They are often bought by the box-load at auction, sorted by the purchaser into individual lots and resold at a hefty premium.  Furthermore, online browsing is a rather uninspiring experience!  It is incapable of recreating the atmosphere of a saleroom brimming with all manner of historical riches, each holding subtle clues to our past.  There is a special magic found at every auction where a cross section of pre-loved objects patiently waits to be re-homed at the fall of the gavel.  
Picture Hilts of pre-1850 Berwick County Constabulary Swords or 'Hangers' for sale at Railtons Saleroom, Wooler.
Hilts of pre-1850 Berwick County Constabulary Swords or 'Hangers' for sale at Railtons Saleroom, Wooler.
Hence, as Covid19 restrictions eased, my first venture back into the post-lockdown ‘world’ was to Railton’s saleroom at Wooler in Northumberland.  For me, a quick hop over the Border, where, in the splendid isolation of ‘viewing by appointment’, I had the luxury of previewing lots for both the forthcoming June & July sales as well as items yet to be catalogued.  A couple of hours flew past in what seemed like minutes.   
Picture Lot 176, a small boxed flintlock pistol by Thomas.
Lot 176, a small boxed flintlock pistol by Thomas.
​Amongst the array of antique furnishings on offer are; two pairs of 19th century Swords or ‘Hangers’ for Northumberland and Berwick County Constabularies, a set of five nicely framed, photographic copies of Mackenzie family portraits, a wonderful cased ‘muff’ or travelling flintlock pistol small enough to fit snuggly in the palm of a hand, a couple of flintlock blunderbuss pistols, an old estate map of ‘Milne Graden’ dated September 1845, a simply huge framed map of Northumberland, which at approximately 5ft x 6ft 6 inches would cover a very large section of anyone’s wall, a nineteenth century medicine cabinet, and a simple wooden ballot box from Ashington Colliery.  Such is the diversity of treasures on offer it is almost impossible to highlight just a couple! Whilst I could have written at length on the historical merits of many of the lots on offer, the two that feature below have been selected for their links to specific families, in the hope they may be reunited with long-lost relatives for whom their value is more than monetary.

Sale of land at Moat Farm, Elsdon in 1686

Picture Lot 139, Railtons July 2020 Sale. Extract from Agreement for the sale and leasback of land at Elsdon, Northumberland dated 1686.
Extract from the sale and leasback agreement for land at Elsdon, Northumberland dated 1686.
​On arrival, a framed document was thrust into my hands for me to transcribe. (Transcription is my specialism after all!)  The document is dated 1686 during the short and troubled 3 year reign of James II, & VII, just 2 years before being deposed and replaced by his daughter Mary and her husband William of Orange during the ‘Glorious Revolution’ of 1688.  It concerns the sale of ‘The Moot’ [Moat, Mote] at Elsdon, Northumberland, which may well relate to land on, or near, the site of ‘Elsdon Castle’.   The document details the names of vendors; Michael Elsden, John Clennell and Martyn Hall of Elsdon, and the purchaser Thomas Pattinson of Newcastle upon Tyne.  The total purchase price for the land was £220 to be paid in instalments on named quarter days when historically it was customary to settle debts.  The document also contains conditions relating to the conveyance in the form of a leaseback to Michael Elsden and his wife Mary for the term of one year, together with the names and signatures of the witnesses to the agreement.

Extract of transcription relating to the 1686 sale of land at Elsdon

Articles of agreem[en]t Indented concluded & agreed upon the
Twenty first day of May in the Second year of the reigne
of our sov[er]aigne Lord kinge James the second over England 
Annoq[u]e d[om]ini 1686 Between Michaell Elsden of Elsden
in the County of Northumberland yeoman of the one par[t]
and Thomas Pattinson of the Towne of Newcastle upon
Tyne gen[tleman] of the other part are as followeth
 
Imp[rimis] Hee the said Michael Elsden for him & Mary his wife doth
Coven[an]t to and with the said Thomas Pattinson that he the said
Michael Elsden sha and Mary his wife shall upon demand well
​Curious as to whether the couple had family and possible descendants a quick check of the Elsdon parish registers for the period, the couple baptised two sons, Thomas in 1675 and William in 1678 whilst living at The Moat.  Thomas Pattinson first appeared in the parish accounts in August 1687.
​Such a document is a true gem for descendants of the Elsden, Clennell, Hall and Storey families synonymous with the area, or the Pattinsons from Tyneside, or indeed the current owners of Moat Farm at Elsdon.   This item will be sold in Railtons July Sale as Lot No 139, and a full transcription of the document is available on request.

The 'Ogg' family of Aberdeenshire & Oldtown Farm Aboyne

​Another lot that caught the eye, this time in the June sale is Lot No 395. It is a pair of framed, silhouette style, watercolour portraits, named as George & Elizabeth Ogg of Oldtown Farm, Aboyne.  The pictures are unusual as the only colour to feature in addition to the traditional monochromatic greys is a vibrant blue.   Whilst rustically naïve on the one hand, there is also a high level of intricate detail, particularly to Elizabeth’s cap, cuffs, face and hankie, but what is their story?  
Picture Close up from the Portrait of Elizabeth Ogg nee Morrison circa 1851
Close up from the Portrait of Elizabeth Ogg nee Morrison of Odltown Farm, Aboyne circa 1851. (Lot 395, Railton's June 2020 Sale)
Picture
Close up from portrait of George Ogg of Oldtown Farm, Aboyne circa 1851. (Lot 395, Railtons June 2020 Sale)
​With more than one couple in Aboyne that could fit the bill, a bit of detective work was required.  After a brainstorming session and a deal of deliberation over intricate details of their dress with colleague and fellow Scottish professional genealogist Lorna Kinnard, it was finally decided that the pictures dated from circa 1851 when a George Ogg, born in Monymusk, Aberdeenshire circa 1824, married Elizabeth Morrison at Old Machar.  
​George Ogg died at Bridgend, Aboyne in November 1900 and it appears his marriage with Elizabeth was childless.  Conflicting information in the records made this pedigree tricky to trace, but a bequest in his Will to niece Maggie Ogg, of Kembeck Street, Dundee, proved to be the key to unlocking the wider family.  
​George’s record at death names his father as having also been called George Ogg, a farmer and his mother as Jane Ogg, maiden surname also Ogg.  This information, which had been recorded by a Morrison nephew created a bit of a wild goose-chase at the start, particularly as there appears to have been intermarriages between members of the Ogg family in Aboyne.
​Fortunately, George’s niece and beneficiary, Maggie Ogg was still resident in Kembeck Street in 1901, where, aged 29, she was working as a dressmaker and living with her widowed mother and younger brother James.  Tracing her line established her as the youngest daughter of John Ogg, a Railway Agent and his wife Margaret McIntyre.  John Ogg died in March 1877 at Dundee Street, Carnoustie.  His death record names his father as George Ogg, occupation Carter, and his mother as Isabella Ogg, maiden name Herd.  At first glance not a match with ‘brother’ George at all!  
Picture 1851 census for the Ogg Family of 259 Barron Street, Woodside
1851 census for the Ogg Family of 259 Barron Street, Woodside
​The informant of John’s death was yet another brother James Ogg, of Woodside, Old Aberdeen.  Following his trail and death record of 1896 confirmed his parents as George Ogg, Carter and Isabella Herd.  James, whose occupation had been a ‘Paper Mill Worker’ was the widower of Margaret Daniel and had been living at Woodside, Aberdeen at the time of his death.  His married daughter Isabella Kemp is recorded as the informant.  This still did not provide any hard evidence that George was indeed the brother of John and James, if anything it was straying further from the subject.  Consulting the parish baptism register for Monymusk was also drawing a blank.  
​Attention then switched to potential parents George Ogg and Isabella Herd for clues.  In 1851 the couple were living at 259 Barron St, Old Machar, with sons George aged 26, Robert aged 10 and daughter Betsy aged 18.  This record provided the proof required as it matched the address given by George junior at the time of his marriage to Elizabeth Morrison in 1851, when his own occupation was that of Carter. 
Picture Marriage of George Ogg, of 259 Old Barron Street, Woodside to Elizabeth Morrisn at Old Machar, Abeerdeenshire in 1851
Marriage of George Ogg, of 259 Old Barron Street, Woodside to Elizabeth Morrison at Old Machar, Abeerdeenshire in 1851
​A second marriage for George Senior, and therefore a different mother for George was also ruled out.  George Ogg senior died at, 5 Bridge St, Woodside in 1877 when he was described as the widower of Isabella Herd.  His occupation is recorded as Master Carter and his parents listed as John Ogg, Farmer at Monymusk and Jane Ogg nee Blair.  He had married Isabella Herd at Monymusk in 1816, however, his name was recorded as Hogg rather than Ogg in the register.  Indeed, when the baptism register at Monymusk was consulted again using the name Hogg, baptisms of children John and James appeared but still no sign of George circa 1823/24.  Isabella died in September 1876 the thus ruling out the possibility of a different mother for George.  
​It is clear from other records that George junior is not the only child whose baptism was not recorded in the parish register.  Therefore, it is likely there are more children than have been accounted for in the outline pedigree below. This snippet of research demonstrates only too well the dangers of taking information recorded in the records too literally and that surnames, even well into the 19th century, may have alternative spellings to those expected! If drawing a blank in searches of indexes, adding a wild card or two might help flush out alternatives.
Picture Outline of the Pedigree for George Ogg of Oldtown Farm, Aboyne.
Outline of the Pedigree for George Ogg of Oldtown Farm, Aboyne.
​Portraits all too often enter the saleroom without any means to identify the sitter and are sold for their decorative furnishing value, rather than their personal history.  However, a bit of time has been taken in this case to reach out to researchers of the Ogg family.  Only time will tell if the portraits have been reunited with their bygone relatives!  If you know descendants of the Ogg family of Aberdeenshire be sure to point them in the direction of Railton’s Saleroom in Wooler.
​As I write the world is still a long way from being in control of Covid19 and the temptation is to turn to Amazon for everything we want and need over and above our daily requirements.  However, there are a lot of businesses out there, Auction Houses and Salerooms amongst them who have adapted their businesses to meet the needs of the new world and need our custom.  Viewings are now being organised to ensure social distancing is maintained and many are now offering live links to the auction room on sale day and facilitate live online bidding as the auction action takes place. 
Why not find your nearest auction and see what facilities they are offering to keep viewing and bidding for lots on offer safe and secure during these difficult times.  If you fancy joining dropping in to Railton’s auction ‘live’ on Saturday 27th June just follow this link through ‘The Saleroom’ If you would rather just browse the treasures on offer and perhaps leave a bid this can be done directly through Railton’s website at https://www.railtons.co.uk/
4 Comments

Broaden Research Parameters to Uncover an Ancestor's Elusive Family

30/5/2020

0 Comments

 
When faced with an information ‘void’ it is understandable how and why researchers sometimes jump on ‘facts’ pertaining to familial connections freely available on the internet or published elsewhere.  There are many reasons why these ‘blackholes’ may arise; nonconformity, a lack of heritable property or Wills, lost or damaged records to name but a few.  Whichever way, if our ancestors were ‘ordinary’ law abiding folks they can often become tricky, if not impossible, to trace with any degree of certainty in the period before the Census and Statutory Registration.
​
There are, however, other measures that can be tried before resorting solely to the research of others! Broadening the net to catch as many potential relatives as possible and investigating their connections is just one way to ‘ring fence’ your own ancestors.  I think of this as gaining access to the required information through the ‘side door’.  Then, as now, family connections and the principle of ‘who’ rather than ‘what you know’ often played a pivotal role.  Taking a closer look at fellow passengers, communicants of a specific church, or trades, occupations and residents in particular community may just pay dividends.
Picture
Sprouston Kirk with Rev Ninian Trotter's Obelisk in the Foreground. © Copyright JThomas and licensed for reuse under creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0

Johnston Case Study

​The case in question is the search for the parentage of Andrew Johnston allegedly born at Berwick-upon-Tweed in 1766 for whom no baptism information has been identified, most probably due to the family’s nonconformity and gaps in the records.  Returning to the other families who emigrated to Australia alongside the Johnstons aboard the Coromandel in 1802, the researcher is quickly bombarded by a surfeit of conflicting information from a variety of sources.  For example:
  • Jane Johnston, wife of emigrant James Davison of Alnwick was Andrew Johnston’s sister
  • John Johnston was a brother to both Andrew Johnston and James Davison’s wife Jane
  • Andrew Johnston was an only child :-/ 
Sadly, very little evidence appears to exist in the public domain or come to light elsewhere to prove or disprove any of the above hypotheses and therefore these conflicts remain unresolved.  The other enduring contention, that Andrew Johnston was descended from George Johnston the 3rd Marquess of Annandale, has persisted for so long it perhaps bears testimony that to date no-one has been able to unearth the true facts about his parentage?  It also seems rather significant that whilst this ‘illustrious’ pedigree was attached to Andrew himself, it was never attributed to his ‘sister’ Jane nor ‘brother’ John or claimed by their descendants.   

Using DNA for early ancestor searches

​For this latter dilemma, science can play a determining role if lucky enough to have a direct male Johnston descendant to test and a bank of well documented Y-DNA to compare it to.  Broadening the search can help identify possible family groups with suitable male descendants to potentially approach regarding Y-DNA testing.  It will likely involve a bit of detective work tracing family lines but might just pay dividends if the trail leads back to a known parish, community, or geographical area. 
​When searching for suitable descendants it is important to watch for breaks in the male line of inheritance.  There are many reasons male lines can be broken but one that is often overlooked relates to inheritance.  If a title or inheritance for some reason passes through a daughter or female line and surnames are changed to accommodate it, the historic line of Y-DNA has been broken and will no longer reflect the original blood line.  If looking for a potential connection to a ‘landed’ family this is worth investigating to ensure the Y-DNA carried is in fact that of the surname expected! 
​It is a big ask for autosomal DNA (atDNA) to provide definitive answers at extremes of generational distance.  Remember, due to the way autosomal DNA is transmitted, (and lost) with each generation that passes there is no guarantee we will have inherited any from our ancestors beyond 3rd great grandparent level.  Any matches that do exist are going to be small, if indeed they exist at all.   
​Furthermore, if a search focus is narrowed to only one ancestor it is easy to lose sight of the fact that, if our line is free of cousin marriages, we have 64, 4th great grandparents and 128, 5th great grandparents.  That is a lot of individuals from whom we might, or might not, have inherited autosomal DNA!  Extreme care should be exercised when attributing DNA matches at this historic distance, particularly if a large amount of DNA is shared between testers or if several different ancestor families lived in the same geographical area.   For example, Sprouston in Roxburghshire is synonymous with a branch of my paternal line ancestors, yet the first 5 atDNA matches that come up under the place name search are on my maternal, rather than paternal line.  

Broaden the ancestral search

​It is all too easy to fixate on a single ‘troublesome’ individual when perhaps the net should be cast wider to encompass siblings, cousins and other more distant family members.  This unfurling of the family tree is essential if looking for clues amongst DNA matches.  
Picture Letter from George Graham to Rev Alexander Waugh in 1773
The Mrs Johnston referred to in this extract from Rev Alexander Waugh's Memoirs cannot be his Grandmother, is not his only sister, and yet appears to be well acquainted with Alexander’s plans for study etc. Therefore, it is concluded that the lady to whom Mr Graham refers is a ‘relation’ of the Rev Alexander and quite possibly the mother of Andrew Johnston born at Berwick in 1766.
​Whilst the ‘devil’ is often in the detail, more general patterns, particularly those of movement and relocation, can often hold vital clues and can be found in traditional paper-trail sources.  When combined with DNA results, the armoury in a genealogist’s toolbox is significantly strengthened.  

Possible Connections between Johnston, Mein & Turnbull Families

​With a broader search in mind, looking at the pedigrees of fellow travellers aboard the Coromandel may yet yield some further clues.  It is known that many of the individuals hailed from the same geographical area of the Scottish Border and North Northumberland and were united by their strong Presbyterian beliefs.  It is therefore not unreasonable to speculate that some familial connection may also have existed.   A generally held belief amongst researchers of the Hawksbury Settlers is that John Turnbull was not only related to fellow Coromandel passengers, James and Andrew Mein but also the Johnston family.
​The theoretical relationships between the Turnbull, Mein and Johnston families is discussed by Albert Turnbull in his 2018 book ‘The Turnbull Pedigree’.  This potential connection is certainly plausible and has been evidenced to a degree by an old family Bible bearing what is believed to be John Turnbull’s signature as a child, alongside that of his mother Margaret Mein.  There is, however, a lack of clarity to the evidence as presented in the book that makes the theoretical paper-trail somewhat challenging to follow or replicate.  It appears the Bible may be the only source of baptismal information for several of the children of William Turnbull and Mary/Margaret Mein. which again raises the possibility of nonconformity.  A possibility that has not been explored by the book’s author.  
​It would be interesting to test Turnbull’s relationship theory against the information pertaining to the inheritance of James Mein’s estate.  A nephew, John Stuart Mein, travelled from Scotland in 1834 to claim his inheritance on the death of his aunt in 1833.  Clearly if Margaret Mein was a relative of James, her Turnbull offspring in Australia (John) appear to have been passed over in favour of those who had remained in Scotland.   Once again there appears to be a degree of conflicting information to wade through from various sources, not least the year of James Mein’s birth recorded as both 1741 (which would have made him of an age with John Turnbull himself, and aged 61 when he left for Australia) and 1761 some 20 years later!  
Picture Notice from the Sydney Herald in 1834 regarding the Estate of James Mein deceased
Notice from the Sydney Herald in 1834 regarding the Estate of James Mein deceased
​Turnbull’s same hypothesis refers to Janet Johnstone the wife of Nicholl Turnbull having been born at Earlston in 1677.  As the Earlston records have not survived from this date knowing the source of this information would also be most helpful.  It may eventually prove to be the case that she was the Janet Johnston baptised at Gordon in August the same year to a William Johnston farmer at Hexpath.  Although William Johnston of Hexpath has yet to be firmly placed within the Johnston family tree, it is thought likely that a familial relationship existed between him and Margaret Johnston, mother of the Rev Alexander Waugh and her known connections at East Gordon.   
Picture The Cauld (Weir) on the River Tweed near Banff Mill cc-by-sa/2.0 - © Walter Baxter - geograph.org.uk/p/2140219
The Cauld (Weir) on the River Tweed near Banff Mill cc-by-sa/2.0 - © Walter Baxter - geograph.org.uk/p/2140219
​As the Turnbull Pedigree also claims that the young John Turnbull spent time at Banff Mill, Sprouston, it put me in mind of my own, again sadly neglected, Turnbull connections.  A paternal 5th great grandmother, Christian Turnbull, was born in 1717 at Easter Softlaw Farm, Sprouston, where her father John Turnbull was tenant.  It did not take me long to remind myself why I give this early branch of the family a wide berth!  There were simply so many of them in Sprouston parish; John and George Turnbull tenants at Easter Softlaw, James Turnbull tenant in Nottylees, Robert Turnbull tenant in Lurdenlaw and another James Turnbull tenant in Lempitlaw Eastfield.  Some 85 years later from the Militia Lists of 1801 some of these Turnbull families were still resident at Lurdenlaw, Lempitlaw and Lempitlaw Eastfield.  In my brief revisiting of this branch of Turnbulls and indeed the other entries in the Sprouston register, no connection between a Turnbull and Banff Mill was apparent.  Indeed, a re-reading of this chapter of the Turnbull Pedigree left me somewhat cold. 
​‘Banff Mill is a tiny village on the river Teviot, opposite Kelso/Sprouston, but in the parish of Berwickshire which is renowned for its poor or missing records’[1]
The efficacy of the Berwickshire records and record keepers aside, the number of errors packed into this single sentence must be a record!
  1. There is nothing left of Banff Mill per se.  It certainly is NOT, nor likely ever was, a village.
  2. It  most definitely lies on the River Tweed not the Teviot.
  3. Far from being opposite Sprouston it is on the same bank.
  4. It was most definitely in Roxburghshire not Berwickshire.
  5. Berwickshire is most definitely a County not a parish.
​Sadly, this has rather left me questioning the credibility of other conclusions that have been drawn within the relevant chapters of this book.  By the time of a potential sibling’s baptism in 1752 the putative parents were living at Overmains, close to Kennetsideheads in Eccles Parish, not as the author would suggest close to Banff Mill.  This surely makes any ‘memory’ or link John may have had to Banff Mill from birth to the age of 4 rather tenuous? With time at a premium the Turnbull connection has been left in abeyance for now.

Johnston Baptisms at Wells St Church 1775-1826

​It is also my experience that delving deeper into available records in areas to which a family has relocated often provides evidence of siblings or other connections.  With this in mind the records of Wells St Church in London between 1775 – 1826 were trawled for further clues pertaining to the Johnston family.  (It should be noted that as a nonconformist church it was unable to host weddings under the Marriage Act of 1753.  Nonconformist couples wishing to marry in England had to do so in an Anglican Church until the introduction of Civil Registration in 1837.)
Picture
John Broadwood and Son taken from https://interlude.hk/the-keys-to-success-burkat-shudi-and-john-broadwood/
​In 1782 Wells Street Church passed into the pastoral care of Rev Alexander Waugh, a known and established relative of Andrew Johnston.  This was also the first year the number of baptisms at Wells Street achieved double figures at a total of 12.  By the year 1784 the number of baptisms had more than doubled to 27.  From this point forward the numbers steadied in the mid- 30s with a few years rising above 40; the highest number of baptisms recorded was 48 in 1815, and the lowest just 19 in 1808.  Thus, it can be concluded there were, very approximately, 50/60 couples of child-bearing age amongst the congregation during this period.  
​The occupational and other information provided by the entries also makes interesting reading.  
  • There was a large proportion of skilled tradesmen baptising children at this time and a lack of father’s designated as ‘labourers’.  Amongst the occupations recorded, there were a high number of carpenters and stone masons possibly reflecting the Georgian building boom of the pre-Napoleonic era.  Several tailors were also noted.
  • Only one illegitimate birth, to a couple from Inverness, was noted during the period.
  • Although it was a Scotch Church there are very few surnames prefixed with Mc or Mac, suggesting the Scots that made up the congregation were predominantly from the lowland regions.
  • A couple of baptisms to the Broadwood family of piano manufacturers were noted in the Wells St records.  The Company founder John Broadwood was born in Oldhamstocks, close to the Berwickshire border in 1832.  He had moved to London in 1761.  It is though that Andrew Johnston worked for the Broadwood firm on moving to London himself.  Is there perhaps an earlier family connection between the two families?  Although his parentage has not been confirmed, they may have been James Broadwood and Margaret Purvis who married there in 1727.  More information can be found on the history of the Company at http://www.broadwood.co.uk/history.html   
  • There were a further six Johnston couples baptising children at Wells St during this period and shortly afterwards, of which two are of particular interest. 
​NB. Only baptisms which took place at Wells St are listed.

1.  Andrew Johnston and Hamilton Bruce

​Name                   Baptism Date     Parents Names                           Parish of Abode               Occupation
John                      6th Oct 1811        Andrew & Hamilton Johnston     St Marys Hornsey             Carpenter
Hamilton              17th Mar 1814    Andrew & Hamilton Johnston     Hornsey                              Implement Maker
Janet                     26th Sep 1816     Andrew & Hamilton Johnston     Hornsey                              Ag Implem. Maker
Andrew                9th Aug 1818       Andrew & Hamilton Johnston     Hornsey                              Ag Implem. Maker
​This Andrew and his wife Hamilton Bruce have been traced back to Berwickshire.  Their two eldest children Mary 1806 and Margaret 1809 were baptised at Chirnside.  From the 1851 census Andrew’s date of birth was circa 1780/81 and the place is recorded as ‘Berwick, Scotland’.  Berwick is often mistakenly referred to as Scotland in the southern census records, but equally, Berwick may also mean Berwickshire.  Andrew died in 1852 and left a Will. 

2.  Andrew Johnston and Elizabeth Fairbairn

Name                    Baptism Date         Parents Names                           Parish of Abode               Occupation
Andrew                  25th Feb 1812         Andrew & Elizabeth Johnston     Marylebone                       Carpenter
Elizabeth               1st Feb 1814            Andrew & Elizabeth Johnston     St John Westminster        Carpenter
Janet                      29th Feb 1816         Andrew & Elizabeth Johnston     St Johns Westminster       Builder
James                    20th Nov 1818         Andrew & Elizabeth Johnston     All Saints, Isleworth          Architect
Margaret              20th Nov 1818         Andrew & Elizabeth Johnston     All Saints, Isleworth          Architect
​This Andrew rose quickly from Carpenter to Builder then Architect.  He and Elizabeth were not the easiest to trace but his line has been validated back to Roxburghshire and parents Patrick/Peter Johnston and Janet Dods who were married at Stichill 25th May 1771.
Compeared Patrick Johnston
And Janet Dods both in this
Parish & craved proclamation in
Order to Marriage  They produced
Patrick Jeffrey Cautioner for the man
& Nicol Dods for the woman [2]

​The family became dispersed when Andrew died circa 1833 and is of particular interest due to the name ‘Waugh’ being adopted by daughter Margaret in later life.  It is also believed there are living male descendants on this line with whom we would be particularly keen to make contact.
​Whilst it is very early days, it is hoped this second line of enquiry into Johnston births at Wells St. may tighten the ring fence around Andrew Johnston’s potential parentage still further.  If you believe you are connected, to either of the Andrew Johnstons mentioned above or indeed the Andrew Johnston who emigrated to Australia aboard the Coromandel in 1802 we would love to hear from you.
[1] Albert Turnbull, The Turnbull Pedigree,
https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/The_Turnbull_Pedigree.html?id=orpUDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y   p.32
[2] Scotlands People, Marriage Patrick Johnston & Janet Dodds 1771 ScotlandsPeople_OPR808_000_0020_0235Z
0 Comments

The Johnston Family of Berwickshire & the 'Coromandel' Settlers of 1802

24/4/2020

4 Comments

 
​When a case crosses my desk that also contains a significant element of local history it really piques my interest.  When it concerns a family that skirts the perimeters of my own this interest is somewhat exacerbated.  So, when approached to look into the Johnston family that formed part of a small group, mainly made up of folks from the Scottish Border Country and Northumberland, who after a period living in London, sailed to Australia in 1802 aboard the ship the ‘Coromandel’ I knew I was in for both an interesting and challenging journey.  Particularly as this little party were followers of the Presbyterian Secession Church, so therefore ‘Dissenters’ or ‘Nonconformists’ in both Scotland and England making them more difficult to trace.  Furthermore, the surname Johnston just happens to have ranked 6th in occurrence per 100,000 of the population in Berwickshire in 1841, so there was a lot of them about! 
Picture Trove, Windsor and Richmond Gazette (NSW: 1888 - 1961) Fri 29 Jul 1927 Page 1 EBENEZER PIONEERS OF THE HAWKESBURY.​ (Extract)
Trove, Windsor and Richmond Gazette (NSW: 1888 - 1961) Fri 29 Jul 1927 Page 1 EBENEZER PIONEERS OF THE HAWKESBURY.​ (Extract)
​There are several branches of Johnstons who touch the perimeter of my own family tree.   In this particular case it is the Johnstons linked to the Waugh family that farmed at East Gordon for many generations.  If you know or even suspect your family of Johnstons hailed from Gordon in the 18th century we would love to hear from you.  Chances are that you, like my clients are faced with a black hole of information necessary to join the dots!  It like a polo mint of family information but nothing to join them in the middle!

Other Johnston Families of Berwickshire 

Back in July 2014 I recounted the sad affair of Johnston descendants in Ballarat during the gold rush, where 4 members of one family lost their lives.  The last of which, it could be argued rather insensitively, met his end courtesy of a hangman’s knot.  These were descendants of Peter Johnston and his wife Margaret Thomson through their son Lt Col James Johnston and his wife Matthew Jane Trotter.  Amongst Peter and Margaret’s numerous other children was Dr George Johnston MD of Berwick upon Tweed.  For anyone familiar with the history of the town, Dr Johnston will be a well-known name, not least for being a founder member and the first president of the Berwickshire Naturalists Club and Mayor of the town no less than three times.
Picture Dr George Johnston by William Bonar.  National Galleries, Public Domain
Dr George Johnston of Berwick upon Tweed, (1797–1855), physician and naturalist. National Galleries, Public Domain
Picture
​There is a blue plaque mounted on the side of his old home in Wool Market, Berwick, now the Anchorage Guest House.
​Dr George’s parents Peter and Margaret had farmed at Simprim, Berwickshire. George was the 10th child born to the couple and was the last of their children to be baptised at Swinton.  Shortly afterwards, the family moved across the border to Ilderton near Wooler where his younger brother Adam was baptised in 1798.   
​The Johnston family of Swinton and Simprim was closely linked to the Johnston family of Whitsome, which is the ‘branch line’ above the Youngs of New Ladykirk.  Their joint family pedigree is outlined in just one table stone in Eccles Kirkyard, albeit with a misleading transcription of the inscription in Cargill’s book for the Border Parishes of Berwickshire:
William Johnston, tenant in Ednam Mains 3.11.1699 50 yrs, spouse Betty Morton 26.1.1721 77 yrs also Janet Dickson 28.10.1737 43 yrs spouse to Patrick Johnston, tenant in Little Swinton who d. 29.1. 1732 69 yrs.  Peter 30.6.1751 1 yr.  Helen 1.5.1752 3 yrs.  Thomas 1.3.1760 2 yrs.  George 6.1.71 16 yrs children of William Johnston tenant in Simprim 12.5.1796 82 yrs.  Margaret Fairbairn his spouse 14.3.1800 82 yrs. James 12.1.1788 son of Peter Johnston tenant in Simprim his son Matthew 14.3.1802 4 months above mentioned father late tenant in Ilderton 11.12.1803 51 yrs his 2 inf. ​​Children James 12.4.1788 11 months.  Matthew Trotter 5.11.1802 4 months.  Margaret 13.9.1811 26 yrs.  Margaret Thomson relict of Peter Johnston 18.1810 [sic] 78 yrs.  James who d. 12.?.1788 1 yr.
​Peter Johnston of Ilderton’s 1st cousin, Patrick Johnston and his wife Margaret Johnston, farmed at Kimmerghame Mains with its links to the families of Hogarth and Clay.  Their son George took the tenancy of West Newton before moving to Stichill where their own son also named George married into the Johnston family of Rumbleton Law, Gordon. 
Picture Headstones in Gordon Kirkyard for the Johnston family of Rumbleton Law, Gordon.  Taken Oct 2019.
Headstones in Gordon Kirkyard for the Johnston family of Rumbleton Law, Gordon. Taken Oct 2019.
​Putting the Rumbleton Law family line to one side for the present it is another Johnston family of Gordon that is of particular interest to this current line of research, especially those with historic connections to the farm of East Gordon and its numerous inter-marriages with the Waugh family, historically of the same place. 

Johnston Family & the Coromandel 

Much has been written about the intrepid voyagers aboard the Coromandel in 1802, not least what has been written by R M Arndell in his book  ‘Pioneers of Portland Head: Builders of Ebenezer Church and School, Early Settlers of the Hawkesbury and Hunter Rivers, and Squatters of the North-West New South Wales and Southern Queensland, including Family Genealogies.’  The general consensus would appear to be that there were between eight and ten original emigrant families.  These included:
1. Zachariah Clarke, his daughter Ann. Zachariah Clarke died 5 December 1804. Ann Selby and Isabella Suddis [Perhaps not on this voyage]
2. Andrew Johnston and his wife Mary Beard Johnston and children, Thomas aged 10 years, William aged 8 years, John aged 5 years, Alexander aged 3 years and Abraham aged 8 months.
3. George Hall and his wife Mary and children, Elizabeth aged 9 years, George aged 7 years, William aged 5 years, John aged 6 months
4. John Johnston and wife Elizabeth Lewins Johnstone. Find out more about the John Johnston - Windsor and Richmond Gazette 2 April 1926 [This obituary is not the correct John Johnston! The gentleman referred to in this instance is in fact the son of Andrew Johnston and Mary Beard.  It is thought the John Johnston aboard the Coromandel travelled as a single man.]
5. John Howe and his wife Frances and child Mary aged 3 years
6. James Davison and his wife Jane Johnston Davison and children John 3 and a half years, James20 months. Select here to find out more about the family of James Davison who settled at Portland Head. [He called his holding Alnwick!]
7. James Mein and his wife Susannah Skein Mein [From Melrose, Scottish Borders, source Australian National Biography].
8. Andrew Mein, brother of James Mein
9. William Stubbs and his wife Sarah and children William aged 5 years, Sarah aged 3 years, Elizabeth aged 1 year.
10. John Turnbull and his wife Ann Warr [Waugh?] Turnbull and children, Ralph aged 10 years Mary aged 5 years, James aged 4 years and Jessica aged 19 months. [Allegedly from Annandale][1]
​The Coromandel was a convict transportation ship captained by William Stirling, who is alleged to have been the uncle of George Hall, one of the free settler passengers named above.
​It would seem, however, the reality is that very little is really known about the genealogy of the Johnston family before they landed on Australian soil and ‘definitive works’ such as that referred to above contain inaccuracies, which when combined with family legends begin to bear little resemblance to actual ancestral fact.  ​The head of the Johnston family which is the subject of the latest research was Andrew Johnston whose birth date and place was recorded in a letter from his wife Mary Beard to their daughter Jane Suttor dated 1 December 1856:
My dear Jane you wish to know birthday.. your dear father was born at Berwick-on-Tweed on 17 March 1766. Myself was born at Highgate, Middlesex 17 October 1768, we were married on the 18 September 1789 in the same church, and by the same minister, that married my mother and father 34 years before us. We have had eight sons and two daughters, was married 60 years wanting 17 days and your dear father has been dead seven years this day[2]
​A longstanding and widespread family legend persists that Andrew was the illegitimate son of George Johnston 3rd Marquis of Annandale, a ‘fact’ strongly refuted by the Annandale family in an article which appeared in the Windsor and Richmond Gazette Friday (Aus) on July 23rd 1926.  It would appear they were right to do so as Y-DNA testing on Johnston male lines to date would suggest two entirely different, unrelated haplogroups.  Therefore any possible link to the Johnston family of Annandale, legitimate or otherwise, can be ruled out – or can it?
Picture Pedigree of 'Johnston of Hilton in the Merse'. Taken from A Genealogical and Heraldic Dictionary of the Landed Gentry of Great Britain and Ireland, Volume 2
Taken from A Genealogical and Heraldic Dictionary of the Landed Gentry of Great Britain and Ireland, Volume 2
​Whilst digging about into the Johnston family groups at Whitsome, an old pedigree of ‘Johnston of Hilton in the Merse’ came to light.  Just what was the fate of the ‘other’ children of Patrick Johnston Merchant Burgess in Edinburgh?  Is it conceivable there was an historic connection between this family and the Johnstons who returned as tenants to Kimmerghame & Whitsome or this a random twist of fate? And, is the marriage of Merchant Patrick’s cousin Sophia, just another tempting red herring?  In truth I have not a clue, and all I can do is deal with the facts of the case as they stand, but the pedigree does make an interesting aside if nothing else.  A connection through a female line would, however, potentially explain a difference in male Haplogroups.
​No record of Andrew Johntson’s baptism has survived, if it ever existed, within the Berwick and surrounding area’s Presbyterian record collection.  Nor are there any ‘obvious’ marriage or burial records observed to date that may pertain to this family.   Berwick also had its own branches of Johnston/Johnson families, which from Guild Records, show that some date back to the early 17th century.  A lengthy trawl of the Berwick records at this stage was unlikely to bear fruit.
​It is believed that a record of stamp duty paid on an apprenticeship in 1785 does relates to Andrew.  At 19 years of age he was quite old to have commenced an apprenticeship.  He was apprenticed to John Home, Carpenter of Norham in 1784.  The entry is dated 13th September 1785 and his apprenticeship ran for four years from 1 Dec 1784 giving a completion date of Dec 1788.  The duty paid was £4 and 2 shillings.  Sadly, no actual copy of the indenture agreement, which would undoubtedly held crucial information, appears to have survived. 
Picture Baptism of Andrew Johnston and Mary Beard's eldest son Thomas at Wells St Scotch Church Marylebone in 1791.
Baptism of Andrew Johnston and Mary Beard's eldest son Thomas at Wells St Scotch Church Marylebone in 1791.
By 1789 Andrew had moved to London where he married Mary Beard at St Johns Hampstead on 18th September. Witness to his marriage was a John Johnston, again about whom little is yet known.  He may have been a relative of Andrew, his fellow passenger in 1802 or even perhaps both.  Andrew and Mary’s first 6 children, all sons, were born in London and baptised at Wells St, Scotch Church, Marylebone.  The officiating Minister was one Rev Alexander Waugh DD, born at East Gordon to Thomas Waugh and his wife Margaret Johnston in 1754.
Picture National Galleries of Scotland.  Rev. Alexander Waugh, 1754 – 1827, Minister of the Secession Church, 1894, James Tassie, Creative Commons
National Galleries of Scotland. Rev. Alexander Waugh, 1754 – 1827, Minister of the Secession Church, 1894, James Tassie, Creative Commons.
An extract from a Waugh Association newsletter, provided at the outset, holds some vital clues. It contains a transcribed copy of a letter written by Thomas Waugh, a son of the Rev Alexander, living at 8 Park Buildings, Camberwell Grove Surrey, dated Sunday Night 22nd Nov 1840, and addressed to Andrew Johnston snr in Australia.  It concerned a work placement in Australia and introductions there for his own son Thomas Scott Waugh b. circa 1821.  The letter firstly refers to a niece of Andrew’s:
​‘It is now 3 years since at my mother's request I and your niece Ellen wrote to you …’  It is believed that Ellen may be the letter writer’s daughter thus inferring more than just a friendship existed between the two families.  Such a relationship is further suggested in his closing paragraph:
​​Now my dear friend farewell. The shades of evening are closing in on us both don't let the night set in without at least one communication from you, as my Father's eldest relative and friend in a distant country…full of intelligence on subjects (your own and your family comforts) and dear to his kind and affectionate heart.

Ebenezer Church 1809

Picture By Peter Gaylard from Australia - Ebenezer Uniting Church Uploaded by berichard, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=12786198
By Peter Gaylard from Australia - Ebenezer Uniting Church Uploaded by berichard, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=12786198
​Andrew Johnston was also instrumental in the design and construction of Ebenezer Church, which is the oldest church in Australia.  A Waugh newsletter also contained the following information:
​Ebenezer Church is not of Northumberland design, as stated. The church was designed by Andrew Johnston, whose family descended from generations of Johnston/ Waugh connections in the Gordon area of Berwickshire. The renown Rev. Alexander Waugh of Wells St. Scotch Church in London was Andrew Johnston’s cousin. [Whoever penned this response was not exaggerating the potential family connections.]
[Whoever penned this response was not exaggerating the potential family connections!]
​For this first cousin relationship to have existed Andrews parents must have been siblings of the Rev Alexander’s parents.  The Rev Alexander Waugh’s parentage of Thomas Waugh and Margaret Johnston of East Gordon is left for posterity by his own hand in his memoirs.  It can therefore be deemed to be reliable.
​A Waugh Society member proposed to two relationship trails to Andrew, unfortunately only one, the most obvious stemming from an unknown sibling of his mother Margaret Johnston was published.  It would be interesting to have sight of the second theory, as ‘cousin’ in Scotland may refer to a more distant relationship than first thought.
Picture
​Notes written by Alexander Waugh’s great great Grandson Evelyn Waugh also pointed to the family’s occupation of land at East Gordon as being of some longevity:

Extract from 'A Little Learning' by Evelyn Waugh

​Alexander's father, Thomas, joined the Secession. He held the rather bleak upland farm of East Gordon, near Greenlaw in Berwickshire, as had his forebears for four generations certainly, probably longer. But he was the last to do so. His elder son, also Thomas, on his succession sold up and bought a larger farm in the far more clement district on the banks of the Tweed, and his son emigrated to Australia...
​[Thomas Waugh junior’s son Alexander married Margaret Middleton in 1830, and from this point forward the Waugh’s become my own distant, but nevertheless blood relatives as 2c 3r cousins]
​It was at this ‘known’ point of familial relationships for Margaret Johnston that the research into Andrew’s Johnston’s line commenced.  Evelyn Waugh was certainly not wrong about the duration of his ancestor’s occupation and bears out the earlier reference to numerous Waugh/Johnston connections. 
​The Gordon Parish records are tricky to interpret as there were several fathers with the same Christian name, no mother’s name is given in any of the baptisms and burial records are non-existent.  It has been possible, however, to sketch Margaret’s immediate family as follows:
Picture Draft outline of immediate relatives of Margaret Johnston wife of Thomas Waugh.  Is it possible that Andrew Johnston b. 1766 descends from Alexander's 1st Marriage to Marian Young?
Draft outline of immediate relatives of Margaret Johnston, wife of Thomas Waugh. Is it possible that Andrew Johnston b. 1766 descends from Alexander's 1st Marriage to Marian Young?
​Then all goes blank – not because the families moved, but rather, as indicated in Evelyn Waugh’s extract, the family left the Established Church in favour of the emerging dissenting Secession Church.  These records are not available online and with the current Covid19 restrictions on movement and work, the records that may hold some clues to fill the current void of vital information have yet to be consulted.
  • CH3/828 Earlston, (East) (Antiburgher) Church, later United Presbyterian, 1751-1887
  • CH3/1311  Stichill, Associate session (Burgher), Kirk Sessions 1755-1979
Paul Brough and his team at Hawick Archives have the request in their ‘to do pile’, but given the current environment, it is somewhat larger than usual and with only a skeleton staff on hand there may be an understandable delay.  Whilst we are waiting to hear back from them, we would love to hear from you, if you know or even suspect your family of Johnstons hailed from Gordon in the 18th century.  Chances are that you, like my clients, are faced with a black hole of information necessary to join the dots!

If you would prefer to contact me privately rather than leaving a public message you can email me here

References

[1] Free Settler or Felon, Convict Ship Coromandel 1802 
 https://www.jenwilletts.com/convict_ship_coromandel_1802.htm

[2] Extract from R M Arndell, ‘Pioneers of Portland Head: Builders of Ebenezer Church and School, Early Settlers of the Hawkesbury and Hunter Rivers, and Squatters of the North-West New South Wales and Southern Queensland, including Family Genealogies’ Sydney, 1984.

Other Useful Links

Historic Ebeneezer Church since 1809 
​http://www.ebenezerchurch.org.au/heritage.htm

Memoir of the Rev. Alexander Waugh, D.D., with selections from his epistolary correspondence
by Hay, James, 1770-1849; Belfrage, Henry, 1774-1835, joint author
​https://archive.org/details/memoirofrevalexa00hayj/page/n8/mode/2up

A Genealogical and Heraldic Dictionary of the Landed Gentry of Great Britain and Ireland, Volume 2
​https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/A_Genealogical_and_Heraldic_Dictionary_o.html?id=Ni4BAAAAQAAJ

Trove, Windsor and Richmond Gazette (NSW: 1888 - 1961) Fri 29 Jul 1927 Page 1 EBENEZER PIONEERS OF THE HAWKESBURY.​
​https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/85951031
4 Comments

What are Manorial Records? How can they help my family history research?

28/3/2020

1 Comment

 
All of the images of Manorial documents are the copyright of Berwick Record Office and by their kind permission were incorporated in examples to be used at Family Tree Live.  They are not to be copied or reproduced in any way without express permission from Berwick Record Office .   
​The transcriptions are my own and likewise may not to be copied or reproduced without my express permission.
​
​Many of my regular readers will have seen me refer to Manorial Records, but before now I haven’t taken the time to explain exactly what they are and the types of useful information they may contain.  I had prepared some information sheets with examples on this subject for the Family Tree Live event in April, which sadly like all other events has been forced to cancel for this year.  Now is perhaps an opportune moment to share a small part of that information .
Picture
Extract from a map of the Manor of Longhoughton
​First, consider all the different types of records we use for family and local history research.  With only a few exceptions, these resources served an administrative function and were created as a result of ever evolving administrative systems.  Simply put; at the top there is central Government or prior to this the Crown;  then devolved government, so within the United Kingdom the governments of Scotland, Ireland and Wales; then county or local government such as County Councils right down to a specific village Parish Council. 
​The various systems, and who was responsible for their administration changed over time.  A prime example is modern day ‘unemployment benefit’ which is controlled by central government, but its origins lie at Parish level with ‘Poor Relief’.  Understanding how administrative systems have evolved throughout history will help enormously when searching for records in archive repositories.  
​In addition to the above, another tier in the various systems of administration included the Manor.  It is unclear exactly when the Manorial system came into existence, but it is thought to have been well established by the time of William I in 1066.  At this time and throughout the Medieval period ALL land was owned by the Monarch, who made grants of land, which became Manors, to his followers making them Lords of the Manor.  The land farmed ‘in hand’ by the Lord of the Manor was known as the ‘Demesne’ with other lands within the Manor rented out to tenants of which there were two types: free and unfree.
​Freehold.  The freeholders or 'free tenants' of a manor held their land in perpetuity, frequently just paying a rent instead of providing a service to the Lord.  Freeholders were largely unencumbered by the Manor but were still obliged to attend the Manor Court.
​Unfree Tenants. The unfree tenants of the Manor were known as Bondsmen or Villeins, and often provided a service such as a certain number of days labour to the Manor Lord in addition to a monetary payment.  By the 16th century, payment by service had largely died out.  This class of tenant became known as a ‘customary tenant’ and leases based on the ‘customs of the Manor’ were introduced.  These comprised:
  • Copyhold.   These tenancies were legally held by a copy of the ‘Court Roll’ from whence it derives its name, and which provided proof of title.   Tenure could be ‘by inheritance’; whereby the tenancy passed to an heir determined by the Manor Court; by life, when the tenancy would expire on the death of the tenant; or by lives, usually three which often included the wife and one of their children.  At the demise of the 'life' or third ‘life’ the tenancy reverted to the Manor and was re-let.
  • Cottars/Cottagers.  These were the poorest of the Manor tenants who often held little more than a Cottage and a meagre patch of ground.  They were usually in the employ of the Lord of the Manor or one of the Freehold tenants. ​
Unfree or Customary tenants were subject to the rules of Manor governing the maintenance of their properties.  Failure to comply could result in a fine or even eviction. 

​All tenants whether free, unfree or customary were obliged to appear in Court and absence without leave to be so resulted in a fine known as an ‘amercement’.  Those with a valid reason for non-attendance were charged a nominal fee known as an ‘essoin’.   The tenants' names appeared in the Court ‘Call Books’ which were often annotated with either ‘amerc’ or ‘ess’, or in later documents 'app' or 'ab' to indicate whether they were present or absent at the meeting of the Court.  
It is worth remembering that ‘The Manor’ differed from an ‘Estate’ as it had the right to hold a Court, and that an ‘Estate’ may have contained several different Manors.   Whilst the Manor was predominantly a rural entity it was not exclusively so, nor was one village or town included in a single Manor.  ​For example, Norham had two Manors: Norham Town and Norham Castle.  Below is an extract from the Call Book for Norham Town in 1835
Picture
Picture
In this later example from 1835 (where the names are easy to read) the abbreviations used are:
​app = appeared ab = absent
All matters relating to the transfer of property within the Manor were heard at the Manor Court and entered in the Court Rolls.  There were two types of Court which dealt with matters concerning land; The Court Baron dealt with freeholders and the Court Customary which dealt with land matters for other tenants.  In practice these two courts were regularly merged, and business was conducted collectively by the Court Baron and often include admittance to land and its surrender.  These courts met frequently, in some cases every fortnight, although their regularity started to dwindle in the late 18th early nineteenth centuries.  Admittances and surrenders were usually accompanied by a ‘fine’ or fee payment.  Where they have survived these documents contain valuable sources of information for the family historian. 
Picture
To this Court came John Nealson (present Bayliffe of this
Mannor) who nowe occupyeth a Horse Milne Situate near the
Bridge end in Tweedmouth within this Mannor Late in the
tenure of John Nealson his Father deceased (who held the same
by Copy of Court Roll of the Lord of this Mannor), Containing in
Length                                                                  and in Breadth
                                And in the same Court the said John Nealson
surrendered into the hand[es] of the Lord[es] by their Steward All his
estate & title in the premises with that intention that it would
please the Lord[es] A graunt thereof into him the said
John Nealson to make.  And in the same Court the said
John Nealson came & tooke out of the hand[es] of the Lord[es]
by their Steward the said Horse-Milne or Tenement with
the app[ur]tan[en]ces To have and to hold the said Tenement
and appurtenances to the said John Nealson his heirs and assigns
for ever according to the Customs of the Mannor aforesaid
By the rents Customs & services therefrom heretofore due
and of right accustomed And for such estate and
entrance so thereof to be had the aforesaid John Nealson
Gives the Lord[es] for fine two shillings And so is admitted
tennant. 
Other payments that may be unfamiliar were; the ‘Heriot’, a fee that was payable on the death of a tenant, and the ‘Merchet‘ a fee payable for the permission for a tenant’s daughter to marry. 

In addition to land matters some manors could hear minor criminal cases such as affray, nuisance, failure to maintain property, trespass and debt at a ‘Court Leet’.  The Court Leet was often combined with the View of Frankpledge, whereby tenants swore to uphold the Kings Peace.  One particularly bloody affray was heard at the Tweedmouth Manor Court in May 1661
Picture
Presentments of the Jury upon their Oathes
George Scott a blood & affray upon Bartho[lomew] Potts his wife                                                   00:08:00
Henry Morise for being Drunke                                                                                                               00:02:06
Henry Morise for a blood & affray upon Patrick Forriste wife                                                            00:02:06
Henry Morise a blood & affray upon his own wife                                                                               00:02:06
William Shirnside an affray upon George Moore                                                                                  00:01:08
William Shernside an affray upon Rich[ard] Given                                                                               00:01:08
George Moore an affray upon William Shernside                                                                                 00:01:08
George Moore an affray upon W[ilia]m Dunken                                                                                   00:01:08
George Moore an affray upon Isabell Dunken                                                                                      00:01:08

An example of the typical matters heard at the Manor Court of Norham Town in 1706

Picture
W[illia]m Marshall is presented by Rees Strother for delving in a part of the
Grounds he Farms of Alexander Stuart Gent[leman] at a place Called Easter Countriggs         1s viij d
John Stewart Pinder presents Roger Abernethy for his beasts Trespassing
frequently on the Corn belonging to the Town of Norham                                                              1s viij d
Alice Abernethy is presented by the Pinder for Cutting of Grasse belonging
To Thomas Tynlin and throwing to her Sons beasts                                                                          1s viij d
George Purvis is presented by John Pawlin Constable for Sowing a piece of
Ground w[i]th lyes at a place Called the Wax Law and reaping Corn of it
tho’ it belongs to W[ilia]m Marshall                                                                                                      1s viij d
David Hume Ba[il[i]e of the Mannor presents Isabel Henderson
for Entertaining an Inmate in her house that Bore a Bastard Child
and amerced                                                                                                                                            xxxix s  xj d
Thomas Tynlin is presented by James Fullerton and Rob[er]t Marshall Constables
for his Fences being out of repair adjoining the Towns Loaning                                                    1s
Ordained that the Sev[era]ll Inhabitants within this Town doe
repair the Causeys on their Sev[era]ll Forefronts of the Houses at or before
Christmas next or be Amerced each                                                                                                   xx s
The Ba[i]ll[ie]s to See it done

NB.  Pinder = kept the manorial pound/pinfold, Inmate= a lodger or subtenant which was severely fined at 39 shillings and 11 old pence, just under £2, approximately £214 as at 2017. 
​From the Tudor period onwards much of the Manor’s administration was absorbed in the new systems of local administration and powers transferred to the Justices of the Peace, parish and town officials.  Common and statutory law began to replace customary law rendering the judicial role of the Court Baron obsolete. Therefore, by the 17th century, the main responsibility of the court was to deal with the transfer of land and minor cases of debt under 40 shillings. This function and the holding of the Court Baron continued right up to the 1920s when copyhold tenure was abolished.  (It was this transfer of Copyhold to Freehold that George Aynsley Smith undertook in his capacity as Clerk to the Ecclesiastical Commissioners in Durham at the Halmote Court.)
In addition to their value to family historians, Manorial Records are a mine of information for local historians too.  Just a small example is some of the field names I remember as a child, such as The Riggs, [High] Mill Lands and Eels Pools appear on an old map for the Manor of Longhoughton at the top of this blog.  The records for Longhoughton Manor date back to 1474. 
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/c/F282364
The surname Elder that appeared on the Alnwick Muster Roll of 1514 is still associated within living memory of the Village today.
https://www.flodden1513ecomuseum.org/project/the-campaign/31-the-alnwick-muster-roll (If you would like a transcription of any part just let me know!)

How to find a Manor in the Manorial Documents Register

To find the archive repository that holds the Manorial records which may be of use to you, they can be found in the Manorial Documents Register online at The National Archives. Here is the link to the page containing the surviving records for Manors in Northumberland.
ttps://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/results/c?sf=textstman&_ocn=Northumberland&_naet=M&_st=mdrc
Clicking on the records of the individual Manor will give the name of the repository that holds the records.  Many of Northumberland’s records are held at Alnwick Castle, which as it is a privately funded archive is neither straightforward (but not impossible) nor at £55 per day, cheap to visit.
https://www.alnwickcastle.com/_assets/media/editor/Archives_doc/2017-03-09-guide-to-searchers.pdf
​The records for Durham have not yet made it to the online register, but as a work in progress will be coming soon.

Other Useful Links

Aside from the records mentioned above, and rather than list them all here, Lancaster University has an excellent website which although its focus is the Manors of Cumbria, it contains a wealth of information covered in far more detail than I have here.
https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/projects/manorialrecords/manors/classes.htm
An extensive Glossary of unfamiliar terms and phrases in Latin, can be found at the University of Nottingham https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/manuscriptsandspecialcollections/researchguidance/manorial/glossary.aspx
​
1 Comment

Why Can’t I find my Ancestors?

29/2/2020

4 Comments

 
Picture
​Sadly, this is a question that is not asked enough!  All too often circumstantial evidence is added to family trees and suddenly square pegs are sitting uncomfortably in round holes.  Most of these errors are largely avoidable and have crept in unwittingly.  There are many reasons why ancestors can’t be located, or the wrong ones appropriated, very briefly here are just a few:

  1. The records have not survived, were not created in the first place, or ancestors did not follow the Established Church.  This is looked at in more depth below, with the focus on researching in the English Border Counties.
  2. The event was not registered in the area thought.  People moved far more than history gives them credit for, particularly when laws governing places of settlement were relaxed for those seeking or moving for work.  Nonconformists such as Presbyterians chose their preferred Minister and often travelled many miles to be part of a particular congregation.
  3. The name differs from that given at birth for which there are also many reasons; the most obvious being a woman changing her name at marriage.  This is to be expected but sometimes a second marriage can muddy the water.  In the England the woman’s name on the record of a second marriage, will be her surname from the first, not her maiden name. In Scotland the reverse is often true with the woman’s name often appearing as ‘x’ or ‘y’, e.g. Jane Smith or Jones, Smith being her maiden name and Jones the surname of her first husband.
  4. Other reasons include taking the name of a stepfamily, inheritance, or avoiding the long arm of the law.  A quick look in the historic newspapers reveals a startling number of criminals using one or more aliases.  It is a little-known fact that a legal process is not required to use a new name under English Common Law, and it still isn't today.  See Deed Poll Office information sheet.
​Of course, there are other reasons too, but it would be impossible to cover such a huge topic in one short blog!  In many cases, however, basic errors stem from a lack of understanding of the records that were kept and the laws that governed them.  Often, the errors start to appear in the period prior to Civil Registration; 1837 in England, 1855 in Scotland, when evidence of familial relationships is sought in Church records.  After all, birth marriage and death form the backbone of genealogy.  Even after the introduction of Civil Registration in England, problems can still occur.

Quick Note re Civil Registration

​When Civil Registration was introduced in England in July 1837 the onus for collecting records was initially placed on the Registrar of the Registration District in which the birth took place.  This resulted in omissions, sometimes due to parental objection to the registration of births, which distorted both regional and national data.  To rectify this, the Births and Deaths Registration Act of 1874 was passed which placed the onus on the parents, rather than the Registrar, and the parents could now be fined for non-compliance or late registration.  This may be just one reason why a birth certificate is proving elusive during the early years of Civil Registration, particularly if the issue of illegitimacy has been ruled out.
​In Scotland when Civil Registration was introduced in January 1855, it was a statutory requirement to be performed by the parents or person in charge of the child from the outset.  There is also the ‘Register of Neglected Entries’ which holds records of vital events dating from between 1800 and the enactment of the new law in 1855, but not registered elsewhere else i.e. a church register.   Although they are very few in number those that do exist can be accessed through the Scotland’s People Website.  This NRS Guide contains some helpful information.

Tracing Ancestors in the Border Region

​Tracing ancestors in the Border regions can be particularly tricky.  This is due to the different laws of each country and movement of people across the border.  Although England and Scotland are part of the Kingdom of Great Britain, and have been since 1707, many of the laws in the two countries were different and continue to be so today.  It might seem crazy after blogging for so many years to be writing about something quite so basic, but as it is something I regularly need to explain I thought it might be of use to a wider audience.
​Another important fact that needs a bit of clarification is what Old Parish Registers actually are and what they cover.  Simply put they are the records of the Established Church of each Country.
  • In England since registers were required to be kept (1538) barring brief interludes, the state religion has been the protestant Church of England, otherwise referred to as the Anglican Church.  
Picture Extract from the 1538 mandate for recording baptisms marriages and deaths in England
Extract from the 1538 Mandate
  • In Scotland the state religion has also been the protestant Church of Scotland, or Presbyterian Church from 1560.   An Act of Privy Council in 1616 ordered that a record of all baptisms, marriages and burials be kept in every parish.  
​‘On 17 August 1560, the Parliament agreed to a Reformed Confession of Faith, a fundamental step away from the Roman Church, and on 24 August it passed a series of Acts that entirely destroyed the Roman Church in Scotland. The celebration of mass was made punishable by a series of penalties up to and including death, and all Papal jurisdiction in Scotland was repudiated.’ 
​All religions other than the Established Church in both countries were known as non-conformists or dissenters, with Roman Catholics referred to as ‘recusants’.  Because the Parish Records are the records of the established churches in each country, they do not as a rule of thumb, include the baptism records for other religions.  Where they do, particularly in the late 18th and early 19th century they may be marked ‘Diss’ or noted as Dissenters.    The registers will, however, contain some marriages and nearly all burials until the introduction of Civic Cemeteries.  Some notable exceptions to this rule were Jews and Quakers.   

Presbyterian Records in England
​
Presbyterian Registers - Baptisms

​Although there were several other nonconformist churches, the focus in this article is Presbyterianism.  Given the proximity to Scotland, Presbyterianism had a firm hold in Northumberland particularly amongst ordinary working folk.  In some towns and villages, the number of Presbyterian Churches outstrips those of Anglican denomination.
​It began as a move towards Puritanism during the 17th century and even became the state religion during the Commonwealth period from 1647 to 1660 when it was reversed at the restoration of the monarchy.  In 1689 the Act of Toleration was passed in England which allowed freedom of worship to all Protestant denominations allowing them to form their own congregations and establish their own places of worship from that date.  Their registers, however, were not bound by the same laws governing the recording of information as the established church, and very few predate 1730.  The Presbyterian Church in England at various times had three main factions, English, Sottish and Burgher. 
Whilst some births of dissenters’ children are entered in the parish registers around the turn of the 19th century, in the main, if recorded at all, they would have been entered in the baptismal records of their own church.  
​
With Presbyterians both side of the Border, the problem is compounded as there was no obligation upon a person or persons to have such details entered in their registers.   Furthermore, many of the registers were themselves rather carelessly kept.  
​‘Names would be left out and added in chunks at the end of the year or some years after the date concerned. Sometimes a family would have three or four children baptised at the same time, the children’s ages ranging from infancy to perhaps six or seven.’  
​Which Presbyterian Church a family attended was a matter of personal choice and was largely down to their preference of Minister.  They often travelled many miles to attend their congregation of choice.  For this reason, baptisms of children may not appear in the immediate area in which the family were resident.  ​As the Presbyterian Church in England followed the Scottish tradition, however, many baptism records will include a mother’s maiden name.   ​
​Also, it is worth checking the registers either side of the Border.  The McDougall family of whom I wrote recently, lived in Donaldson’s Lodge in England.  Rather than baptising their children in England, they crossed the Border to Coldstream.  A quick look at the register for Cornhill also illustrates it was not all one-way traffic, with some crossing the Border into England.
Picture
Extract from Cornhill Parish Register (transcript) 1813
​With the introduction of Civil Registration in 1837 non-conformist churches were asked to send their registers to the General Register Office in London.  Many did and these can be found at The National Archives.  Others did not and were retained by the respective church, however, many have since been deposited in local record offices.  The best place to start looking is The National Archives Discovery Catalogue which lists the collections held at all local repositories.  (Particularly relevant at present whilst the online Catalogues of Berwick and Woodhorn are being updated and are offline.)

Marriages

​Hardwicke’s Marriage Act of 1753 stated that couples of ALL denominations must marry in an Anglican Church.  The only exception to this rule was Jews and Quakers.  The accepted method was by the reading of banns on 3 successive Sundays or by obtaining a licence from the Bishop of the Diocese.  This rule stayed in force until 1837 and the introduction of Civil Registration.  Marriages could now be performed in a Presbyterian Church in the presence of a Registrar.  The resulting records, however, will be found in civil registration records rather than in the church register. 
​
The reality in the English Border Counties was that in order to avoid the Act and paying the associated taxes, many folks hopped across the border into Scotland to avail themselves of the differing laws governing marriage.  I have covered the topic of ‘Irregular Marriage’ in a previous blog ‘Tying the Knot in the Borders’ which may be helpful if looking for clarification in this particular area.

Other Presbyterian Records
Kirk Session Records

​Where they survive the Kirk Session records can provide a wealth of information about our ancestors over and above birth, marriage and death.  The Kirk Session was the governing body of each church, made up of the Minister the Session Clerk and the ‘Elders’ of the congregation.  It was essentially a court which dealt with minor misdemeanours such as drunkenness, failure to observe fast days, lewd dancing, penny weddings but also held enquiries into promiscuous behaviour and illegitimacy.  Sadly, not many early Session Minute Books have survived, but where they do, they can make quite entertaining reading.  
Picture
By kind permission of Berwick upon Tweed Record Office. BUR/P/10/14 Norham Kirk Sessions 1796.

Communicants Rolls

​Where they have survived these records can hold a wealth of information including;  place of residence, occupation, when admitted to the congregation and crucially from where, if it was by certificate or new admittance, when they left , where they went to, and any remarks made by the Minister concerning the individual or family. 
Picture
Reproduced by kind permission of Berwick Record Office. Communicants Register, Crookham Presbyterian Church

Nonconformist Churches in Scotland

Scotland too has its foibles.  In the 18th and 19th centuries the Church of Scotland splintered into many different Presbyterian factions; Associate Presbytery, the Relief Church, Burghers, Anti-Burghers, Auld Lichts, New Lichts, the United Secession, Original Secession, United Presbyterian and the Free Church are a few.
​
Like their non-conformist counterparts in England the records were outside the Established Church, and do not constitute ‘Old Parish Records’.  The records that have been indexed are available at Scotland’s People Centres or online through the Scotland’s People website. Those that have not may be held at the National Records of Scotland.  Additionally other miscellaneous records are held at the Scotland’s People Centre in Edinburgh, a list of which can be found at Appendix 3  of the Coverage of the Old Parish Registers   

Old Parish Records in England

​Although in theory parish registers should exist from 1538, the reality is that very few actually do.  Before dashing off to look for the vital event for your ancestor it is always best to check the register you need actually exists for the period required.  A simple way to do this for English records is to take a quick look at the Family Search wiki page for the relevant church or town.   Below is an example for Wooler, the Parish Church (Anglican) being St Mary’s.  As can clearly be seen there are several nonconformist churches.  The page also contains information where their records can be found.  NB.  I suspect this page is not totally up to date as some of the other well-known commercial databases hold some of these records too, if I remember correctly! 
Picture
​The information covering Darlington is far more comprehensive for the Parish Registers of St Cuthbert, but not so comprehensive for nonconformist churches.  Not only are they unsure where they were, they have no information as to where their records can be found.  
Picture
​Points to remember regarding the registers of Presbyterian and other nonconformist protestant churches going forward.  Where they exist the registers:
  • Will contain Baptisms, but very possibly not all.
  • Will not contain marriages.  Very occasionally a marriage that took place elsewhere is noted, but this is unusual.  Most often if it has it will be noted next to the baptism of a child. 
  • Will not contain deaths or burials.  Until the introduction of Civic Cemeteries burials would mostly likely have taken place in Anglican Churchyard and should appear in its respective register.  There are a few exceptions which can be viewed online at The Genealogist and The National Archives (RG) or local archive repositories.
​All in all, tracking down ancestors in England’s Border Counties can be trickier than most.  In some cases, their birth and marriage information may not have been recorded at all.  

Further Information

​How and why the registers in both countries came about makes interesting reading.
Bissett Smith, Vital Registration, A Manual of the Law and Practice concerning The Registration of Births, Deaths and Marriages [Scotland], Edinburgh, 1902

Chris Paton, Discover Scottish Civil Registration Records
http://www.gen-ebooks.com/discover-scottish-civil-registration-records.html

Chris Paton, Discover Scottish Church Records, 2nd Edition,
https://www.my-history.co.uk/acatalog/Discover-Scottish-Church-Records-UTP0281A.html

​J Charles Cox, ‘The Parish Registers of England'
https://archive.org/details/parishregisterso00coxjuoft/page/n3/mode/2up
4 Comments

Diplomatics – There is much more to old documents than their contents!

25/1/2020

2 Comments

 
​Having acquired the basic skills required to decipher the handwriting in old documents from last month’s post, now is perhaps an opportune moment to introduce the subject of Diplomatics.  After all there is an awful lot more to a document than just its contents!  To be deemed trustworthy an historic document must be deemed both authentic and reliable.
​‘Reliability means that the record is capable of standing for the facts to which it
attests, while authenticity means that the record is what it claims to be.’[1]
Diplomatics is defined by the OED as: The science of diplomas, or of ancient writings, literary and public documents, letters, decrees, charters, codicils, etc., which has for its object to decipher old writings, to ascertain their authenticity, their date, signatures, etc.
​As such, it sits side by side with palaeography, a sister science so to speak.  
Picture 'Fake News' By Frederick Burr Opper - https://www.loc.gov/resource/ppmsca.29087/, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=57725977
By Frederick Burr Opper - https://www.loc.gov/resource/ppmsca.29087/, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=57725977

How authentic is your document?

​Documents have been forged since history began and is by no means a recent phenomenon.  One of most famous forgeries of the 20th century were the Hitler Diaries;
On May 6, 1983, West Germany’s Federal Archives released the results of a forensic investigation into what turned out to be one of the greatest hoaxes of the 20th century–the Hitler diaries. Just weeks earlier, the newspaper Stern had announced the discovery of 60 small notebooks, purported to be the personal diary of Adolf Hitler, covering his rise to power in the 1930s and later years as Nazi leader and architect of the Holocaust. The newspaper and its parent company paid journalist Gerd Heidemann a small fortune for the items, which Heidemann said had been recovered from an airplane crash shortly after the end of World War II and then smuggled to the west from Communist East Germany. The announcement made headlines around the world—and unleashed a firestorm of criticism. The newspaper restricted access to the diaries, allowing several World War II experts only a quick look at the documents. Once excerpts from the diaries were released, however, the story began to fall apart. In early May, the Archives, who looked into the matter at the request of the West German government, announced its findings: The Hitler “Diaries” were fakes, and bad fakes at that—the handwriting didn’t match, they had been created using modern materials and much of the content had been plagiarized. Nobody knows what happened to the millions of Deutsche Marks paid for the documents, but both Heidemann and his accomplice, forger Konrad Kujau went to jail.[2]
Of course, most of us are not concerned with the intricacies of such ancient documents and are unlikely to conducting forensic experiments into the contents of ink and glue to prove a documents authenticity.  I think whilst we all have the basic common sense to realise that a Last Will and Testament written in biro on ‘Basildon Bond’ paper purporting to date from the 1750s is a fake, the history of paper is, nonetheless, a fascinating subject.  When the Accounts of the Newcastle Chamberlains 1508-1511 came to light in 1978, it was the composition of the paper and indeed the watermark (which proved to be French) that provided part of the proof of their authenticity.[3]  If the history of paper and watermarks is of interest to you, The University of Warwick as some very useful links.
PictureA fleur-de-lis watermark, 1787 Edinburgh Edition of Burns Poems. Chain and line handmade paper. Wiki Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_fleur-de-lis_watermark_on_handmade_paper,_1787_Edinburgh_Edition,_Burns_Poems.jpg
A fleur-de-lis watermark, 1787 Edinburgh Edition of Burns Poems. Chain and line handmade paper. Wiki Commons
​It is, however, as well to be aware that forgeries, particularly concerning the ownership of property are far more common than may be imagined.  Only this week whilst looking something up in NRS catalogue concerning the family of Borthwick of Borthwick, the catalogue entry contained the stark warning:
​ Section 2 of the catalogue covers peerage case papers. It includes some forged title deeds, while some genuine titles in section 1 are endorsed with forged writings as part of the peerage cases. An introduction to section 2 explains in more detail the reasoning behind the forgeries[4]
​That is a very brief overview of authenticity, but what about the aspect of reliability?

How reliable is your document?

​Stepping back a few hundred years to John Hardying chronicler to both Henry V and Edward IV in the fifteenth century.  Hardying is described by Scottish Historian Dr Alastair Macdonald as ‘… a slippery individual.  By his own account he was a spy; he was also a forger; and he appears to have been a thief as well.’  Much of Hardyngs fraudulent activity surrounded the justification for English suzerainty over Scotland and the two versions of his Chronicle ‘offer radically varying accounts of English political history in Hardyings own lifetime’.  Each version had been manipulated to reflect the interests of his ‘employer’, the King.  In such a way he supported the Lancastrian claim of Henry V in the first version and that of the Yorkist Edward IV in the second.  It is therefore easy to see how historical fact can be easily distorted by taking the point of view of an author at face value.
PictureMap of Scotland by John Harding Creative Commons British Library, Lansdowne MS. 204, f.226v and Harley MS. 661 ff.187-188
Map of Scotland by John Harding, Creative Commons British Library, Lansdowne MS. 204, f.226v and Harley MS. 661 ff.187-188 (Note West is to the top.)
(More about John Hardying can be found on the British Library Medieaval Manuscripts Blog
https://blogs.bl.uk/digitisedmanuscripts/2019/09/mapping-medieval-scotland-between-politics-and-imagination.html )
When considering a source, any source, ask yourself how reliable is it likely to be, and just how credible is the author – would they really have been privy to the intimate details of the subject?  For example: Is the diary of Mrs Miggens the baker’s wife likely to contain accurate information concerning the family affairs of Mr Johnson, the Landlord of White Horse Inn?  If Mrs Miggens turns out to have been Mr Johnson's married sister, then it is far more likely she will be a credible source of information about the Johnson family than if she was merely the town’s gossiping busybody.  However, this still requires an element of caution.
​We saw in an earlier post how Mr William Brewis of Throphill felt most aggrieved at not being a beneficiary of a Will.  Perhaps he had either forgotten, or did not know that the deceased had much closer family than himself when he wrote:
​Died at Whittingham on Wednesday 7th February John Carnaby Esq our cousin …it is said he has left his property which is said 15 or 20,000 to Dr Trotter of Morpeth, should it be so, it is said he was not capable of  making his will but the Dr had haunted  him to settle his affairs upon the Hargreave family of Shawdon, how that may be time will determine, he has no relative but our family and more strange, never sent word that he was dead, or invited to his funeral!!!
​For both amateur and professional historians there is a simple methodology which can be applied to research using documentary sources.  Its a series of memorable questions to ask ourselves, and these are;  Who?, What?, How?, Who else?, Why?, Where? and When?
  • Who?  Ask yourself who is writing the document and what is their relationship (if any) to whom the document was intended.
  • What?  What caused the document to be written, was it a formal record of an event such as the purchase or sale of property, or an informal personal letter notifying of a birth or death in the family.  The contents of the document will most likely hold the answer.
  • How?  How was the document drawn up, what is it written with and what is it written on?  What hand is it? i.e. Secretary, Italic, Court, what are its distinguishing features?  What type of language is used formal, formulaic or informal? etc
  • Why?  Why was the document written, what is the document’s purpose? The answer is usually contained in the document’s contents.
  • Who else? Who physically wrote the document, was it a clerk, a secretary or someone the person knew?  This is particularly relevant in an age when very few people could write themselves. Early Wills for example are rarely written by the testator!
  • Where?  Where was the document written and where was it intended to go? The place a document originated, and its intended destination is an important factor in determining both its authenticity and credibility.
  • When?  When was the document written?  The date a document was written can often provide context to its contents.  Equally, if it transpires a document was penned after someone is known to have died then clearly something is wrong.
​Following these simple steps can also help identify what type of document it is.  The language of many official documents is highly formulaic and often specific to a documents purpose.  It crops up in more places than you perhaps realise.  Although there are many more, here are just a few of the types of documents that follow a set format:
  • Criminal and Administrative Legal Process
  • Documents relating to Sale and Transfer of Property or Possessions:
  • Financial Transactions and Settlements
  • Indentures such as Apprenticeships and Military Enlistment
  • Ecclesiastical such as Session Minutes
If you are just itching to practice both the skills of palaeography and diplomatic by following the methodology outlined above, below is a document dating from 1780.  It is an account for the burial expenses of an unknown individual.  At first glance it might appear to be just a list of the costs incurred, but on closer inspection it is packed with historical information and contains subtle clues as to who the ‘writer’ may have been.
Picture An  Account for Burial Expenses dating from 1780. NRO 1955A 140
NRO 1955A 140 Burial Expenses from 1780 page 1
PictureAn  Account for Burial Expenses dating from 1780. NRO 1955A 140
NRO 1955A 140 Burial Expenses from 1780 page 2
(If you would like a large image to work with please email me & I shall send you a copy)
For those of you of a mind to have a go and would like some feedback on the conclusions you have drawn you can post them in the comment sections below.  Alternatively, if you would rather do this privately you can email them to me by following this link.
If you are at all interested in how to go about describing the hand and other features of an old document, I am happy to supply a copy of my analysis of Jane Austen’s Will as an example.  Please just ask.  It scored reasonably highly in my university studies at A3, the main criticism being I hadn’t compared to other documents written in her hand at earlier dates.  The original will (along with a transcription) is available online at The National Archives.   Although it is only 12 lines long, it contains a mixture of formulaic and personal language and some interesting points worthy of note to any family history researcher.  
​[1]  Heather MacNeil, ‘Trusting Records: Legal, Historical and Diplomatic Perspectives’, London: Kluwer, Academic, 2000.
​[2] Inside History, https://www.history.com/news/historys-most-famous-literary-hoaxes
[3] Joan Philipson, ‘A Note on the Paper’, C M Fraser ‘The Accounts of the Chamberlains of Newcastle upon Tyne Chamberlains 1508 -1511’ Newcastle, 1987.
[4] National Records of Scotland, GD350, Borthwick of Borthwick.

Further Reading and Useful Links

​The Will of Jane Austen, 27 April 1817.  
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/museum/item.asp?item_id=33 

Caroline Williams, ‘Diplomatic Attitudes, From Mabon to Metadata’ Journal of the Society of Archivists, Vol 26, 2005, Issue 1.  Available through Taylor & Francis Online.  ££ 

Society of American Archivists https://www2.archivists.org/glossary/terms/d/diplomatics

Heather MacNeil ‘Trusting Records in a Post Modern World’.  Association of Canadian Archivists
https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12793/13991​
MacNeil, Heather. ‘Trusting Records: Legal, Historical and Diplomatic Perspectives’, London: KluwerAcademic, 2000.

The University of Warwick, Paper and Watermarks,
https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/ren/archive-research-old/lima/paper/
​

Peter Goldsborough, Gordon Donaldson ‘Formulary of old Scots Legal Documents’, Edinburgh, 1985 published by The Stair Society.  Its like ‘hens teeth’ to find a copy to purchase but ‘WorldCat’ lists the libraries where it as available to view.
2 Comments

Crack the Code & Get to Grips with Transcribing Old Documents

28/12/2019

5 Comments

 
Picture
​With not only a new year but a new decade on the doorstep many folks will be turning their thoughts to outlining goals and aims for their research in the coming months.  Some will be considering taking a course to learn a new skill.  For the researcher who is serious about digging into the past the one vital weapon to have in the armoury is the ability to read, transcribe and interpret old documents.  
​The ‘art’ of palaeography can open many doors to the past in all fields of historical enquiry not least that of family and local history research.   Too often the interpretations and findings of reputable authors and scholars who have gone before are relied upon, but dig a little deeper and it often becomes apparent that evidence is based on the same old documents regurgitated time and again.  Even worse are the opinions based on evidence extracted from a summary or abstract of a document’s contents rather than the document itself.   This became glaringly apparent to me during the research phase of my Master’s dissertation – so much vital evidence had been overlooked as the document that formed the basis of my thesis had clearly not been read or analysed before.
​It may seem daunting when first presented with a page of seemingly illegible scrawl, but do not be put off by it.  You do not need any specialist skills, equipment or an intellect the size of a planet to be able to decipher old handwriting, just practice, a pencil, a magnifying glass and more often than not, a good deal of patience.  There are or course a few simple rules:
​Firstly, get to know your document – Familiarising yourself with the type of document you are transcribing will enable you to: 
  • Recognise the different hands and letters forms
  • Recognise the different clauses and the language and phrases they are likely to contain.  These can act as a key and enable you to focus on the sections most relevant to your research.  Many formal documents were highly formulaic and contained set phrases – recognising these can be of huge benefit.

Different Hands and Letter Forms

​​Although English and Scots were the spoken word, the language of written documents before the advent of the early modern period at the beginning of 16th century was Latin.  From this point forward English and Scots gradually crept into common usage in written records.  Different hands (styles of writing) were used for specific purposes and those most likely to be encountered and prove the most problematic, date from the 16th, 17th & 18th centuries.  They are:
Picture Italic Alphabet
The above is taken from ‘English Handwriting 1500 – 1700’ an online course provided by Cambridge University. https://www.english.cam.ac.uk/ceres/ehoc/index.html. It is an image after Martin Billingsley, circa 1618.
  • The easiest to read and easiest to teach
  • Most commonly used in personal correspondence and by women
  • Evolved into the hand we know today
  • In early periods not usually found elsewhere but creeps into all manner of documents over time
  • Beware the minims – i u v m n and sometimes w can be hard to determine
Picture  Court or Chancery Hand Alphabet
The above is taken from ‘English Handwriting 1500 – 1700’ an online course provided by Cambridge University. https://www.english.cam.ac.uk/ceres/ehoc/index.html. It is an image after Martin Billingsley, circa 1618.
  • Used for acts of law and often where a document was drafted by a Lawyer
  • Deeds for the sale, purchase, and leases of land
  • Apprentice indentures and marriage settlements
  • Charters (Town or Burgh etc) and Commissions issued by Government
  • Continued to be used in Acts of Parliament until 1836
  • At first glance it looks horrendous, but actually letter forms varied very little and once it is familiar to you, it is relatively straightforward.
  • Capital letters can be particularly tricky and again beware the minims!
Picture Secretary Hand Alphabet
The above is taken from ‘English Handwriting 1500 – 1700’ an online course provided by Cambridge University. https://www.english.cam.ac.uk. /ceres/ehoc/index.html An image after Jean de Beauchesne
  • As the name implies it was used by clerks and scribes
  • In its more cursive forms it was much faster to write (and often more difficult to read!)
  • It appears in a wide variety of documents from government documents and accounts to personal correspondence
  • The hand varied enormously in quality, style and letter forms
  • It is the hand most commonly encountered by genealogists and local historians

A few basic transcription Hints & Tips

1. The document, whatever and whenever it may be, is ALWAYS your key!!! ​
​It is important to remember that, then as now, people’s hands had their own personal style – but these were still based on standard letter forms and conventions which evolved over time.  Start by writing out the words you DO recognise and build a ‘lexicon’ of different letter forms that appear in the document as you go.   (You may also find it useful to number the lines on a COPY of the document so as not lose your place or inadvertently miss a line entirely – its easily done!) 
Picture
Inventory of John Smith of West Rainton 1660 DPRI 1 1660 S4
The scribe here has an unusual flourish above the letter 'c' (highlighted).  His lowercase 'g's are also unusual and a particular characteristic of his hand.  You will inevitably encounter words that are no longer in common usage, such as 'prized' for appraised, 'kie' for cows and 'stagard' meaning either stackyard or a temporary roof capable of elevation, and designed to protect a stack or rick of hay or grain (here I think meaning the former).  Compiling a glossary of unfamiliar words and phrases as you go can prove invaluable.
Picture
Extract from E 36_254, p 112 Horses given out after the Battle of Flodden in 1513
2.  Secretary Hand – Common letter forms, variants and conventions
Picture
Picture
Picture
3.  Common Contractions, Abbreviations and Suspensions
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
4.  Numbers, Dates and Spellings
​Although these do not usually cause too much difficulty there are a few points that are worth remembering.
Numbers
Numbers are almost always written in roman numerals in earlier documents and almost always in financial accounts.  As these are easy to look up if not already familiar they are not covered in detail here.

One point that does sometimes catch folks out are the numbers 1 - 4.  Whilst it is perfectly normal to expect them to appear as ‘ii’ iii’ ‘iv’ etc - in written documents the terminal digit ‘j’ is used -  so ‘j’ = 1,  ‘ij’ =2, iij =3 and instead of ‘iv’ for 4, it appears as ‘iiij’.  In the same way 14 is ‘xiiij’,  23 ‘xxiij’ & 29 ‘xxviiij’ etc.  Another point of note is the use of superscript xx to mean ‘score’ or twenty, so that iij xx is common for sixty i.e 3 x 20 = 60
Dates
Calendar years
In England until 1752 the new year began on Lady Day or 25th March, thus the 24th March 1750 was followed by 25th March 1751. In 1752 England and America finally caught up with the rest of the world and the new year was set where it is now as 1st January.  (Eleven days were also wiped from the calendar in the same year - Wednesday 2nd September 1752 was followed by Thursday 14th September 1752).

In  Scotland, however, the new calendar year was adopted by an act of Privy Council in 1599, so that in Scotland 31 December 1599 was followed by 1 January 1600 which conforms to modern convention. 
Regnal Years
In the course of your forays into old documents it is likely that at some point you will encounter ‘Regnal Years’.  These are measured in years from the date the Monarch ascended the throne.  For Henry VIII his reign began on 22 April 1509, therefore the 5th year of his reign began on April 22 April 1513 and ended 21 April 1514.
Picture
​'from the xij day Julye Ao Vto Re nunc'  Henr viij (not shown)  - Note the superscript ‘o’ from Latin ‘Anno’ and the ‘to’ above the V from the Latin ‘Quinto’ meaning fifth.  This is also expressed as ‘th’.  Reges nunc is Latin for ‘now King’.  Extended it reads  xij Julye A[nn]o Vto R[eg][es] nunc Henr[ey] Viii/  and translates as ‘12 July in the 5th year of the reign of Henry VIII now king’.  This document was written in English but it is not uncommon to find many such documents ‘topped and tailed’ in Latin.
​
C R Cheney (ed.), Handbook of Dates for Students of British History is extremely handy for the regnal years of Kings of England but no use for the Scottish Kings whatsoever.  They can be found in Archibald H Dunbar, Scottish Kings: A Revised Chronology of Scottish History 1005-1625.  The book is rare but a copy can be accessed online through archive.org at 
​
https://archive.org/stream/scottishkingsrev00dunbuoft/scottishkingsrev00dunbuoft_djvu.txt
Dates in Latin
It was also quite common for the dates in documents written in both English and Scots to appear in Latin e.g. 24 May 1567 would be ‘vicesimo quarto die Maij  mvclxvij’
​
Also be aware of abbreviations for months ending ‘ber’ -  so September to December.  ‘9ber’ is taken from the Latin for nine or ‘novem’ and relates to November not September as the 9th month! Fortunately this little quirk is rare and more common in Scots than English
Scottish ‘jaj’ Dates​
​If transcribing Scottish documents this is one form of dating you will encounter a lot!  It is much easier to think of it as what it actually is – a corrupt form of 1m or 1,000 with year numbers added with a ‘C’ at end so the year 1600 would be written jajvj C.  (the jaj = 1,000 the vj C 600) or 1652 as ‘jajvj C & lij’ – note the ‘&’ after the C.
Spellings
It is helpful to remember there was no such thing as a dictionary of ‘all words’ much before the definitive work of Dr Johnson in 1755.   Spelling was largely phonetic, and words were written as they were spoken which means a great deal of regional variation occurred.  You may find it helpful to say the word out loud in your best attempt at a regional accent.  Nonetheless, it is particularly important to check words in your transcription which make no sense at all - as this probably means that your solution will be wrong and you should think again!  It may be that just one or two letters have been mis-transcribed even though the word is misspelled according to modern convention!  As rule of thumb if it does not appear in dictionaries of old words it was not a word at all.  Although the Oxford English Dictionary Online requires a subscription it  is an invaluable aid to transcribers.  
Scots had its own peculiarities – most commonly ‘sch’ for sh and ‘quh’ for wh.  In addition ‘and’ was the usual Scots termination for verb forms now ending in –ing – e.g. ‘teland’ for tilling (as in land).  Words ending ‘ed’ were often replaced by –it, –yt or –at – e.g. ‘clothit’ for clothed.  An ‘is’ at the end of a word indicates a plural e.g. ‘debtis’ for debts.  Often if preceded by an adjective this too will be in the plural e.g. ‘the saidis debtis’ meaning ‘the said debts’ etc.  
Punctuation
​Punctuation was virtually non-existent in the form we know it today, which can make the interpretation of documents tricky too.  Again reading out load may well help you make sense of what has been written and help you spot any inadvertent omissions!
Conclusion
Picture
Clearly it is impossible to cover every aspect of palaeography in one short blog, but I hope the brief overview and hints and tips above have inspired you to have go at tackling some older documents.  If you are still feeling unsure of how and where to get started, keep an eye open for opportunities to learn through practical projects run by local archives or history societies.  Alternatively, I shall again be running two workshops at Family Tree Live the 17th and 18th April 2020 at Alexandra Palace.  The workshops are included in the price of admission to the show but must be reserved in advance.  Workshop places and admission tickets can be booked online at the same time you purchase a ticket at
​https://www.family-tree.co.uk/information/family-tree-live-workshops

If you would prefer some ‘one to one’ personal tuition, perhaps using documents that relate to your own personal research project then please do get in touch.  Then again, if you would like to me transcribe the documents for you I would be delighted to do so too!

Useful Resources for Transcription

Online Dictionaries
Dictionary of Scots Language http://www.dsl.ac.uk/
Oxford English Dictionary http://www.oed.com/ (requires a Subscription or is available for free through many public libraries)
Latin Dictionary https://www.latinitium.com/latin-dictionaries This brilliant new site also has the benefit of English to Latin

Books
Hilary Marshall ‘Palaeography for Family and Local Historians’ Philmore, 2010.
Bruce Durie ‘Understanding Documents for Genealogy & Local History’, Stroud, 2013
For Scots
Grant G Simpson ‘Scottish Handwriting 1150 – 1650’ Edinburgh, 1998.

Websites
Pit your palaeography skills against the ducking stool with The National Archives
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/palaeography/
Some further guidance and practice available at
https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/manuscriptsandspecialcollections/researchguidance/medievaldocuments/introduction.aspx
An online course in conjunction with Cambridge University  https://www.english.cam.ac.uk/ceres/ehoc/
​
5 Comments

Pills, Potions, Poisons & other Paraphernalia

30/11/2019

0 Comments

 

The Strickland Family of Yarm - Records of Chemists, Druggists & Pharmacists for the Family Historian

Picture
From the Sketch Book of Mary Ogilvy Davison. No doubt all manner of ailments and 'beasties' found their way into the Chemist & Druggist's shop!
It can be the smallest thing that sparks a thought (or indeed evokes a memory) and so it was that whilst chatting to my brother the idea came to mind for the topic of this month’s blog.  Middleton St George near Darlington cropped up in our conversation to which I mentioned we had relatives who had lived there in times past.  ‘Who was that’ he asked. ‘The Middletons’ I said. ‘Never heard of them’ came the reply, as sure and certain as any direct admission could be that he has never read any of my blogs!  If he had then perhaps he would have remembered the post of December 2014 and the four Middleton brothers of Strathmiglo who were all lost to war, and other connections that have cropped up in many others.  
​Not that I blame him - family history is not for everyone and very often the preoccupation with pedigrees rather than the lives of the people within them can be pretty dull, two dimensional and boring.  Nevertheless,  'Every generation should produce at least one person who is prepared to preserve and enhance the [family] records' wrote Anthony Christopher Middleton of his inability to ‘identify or isolate’ one suitable candidate in the UK in a letter to Philip Aynsley-Smith dated 1992.   Philip had been assisting Anthony with his history of the Middleton family, or as he referred to it his ‘Magnus Opus’, by drawing and building on research first assembled by his father George.  In the current generation of Smith family and its broader connections I guess that ‘one person’ would be me.
As it is some time since I have ventured into ‘Middleton’ territory it is perhaps the time to revisit them and look at some other members of the family who, rather than be farmers, were ‘Chemists & Druggists’.  It is also a good opportunity to share some of the interesting and freely accessible record sources that are available for folks with ancestors who followed a similar occupational path.
By the mid-1800s, the English chemist and druggist were well-established professionals, defined by their work in a wholesale and retail capacity, and catering to a population before, instead of, or in addition to, the intervention of a GP. Their services were wide ranging and competitive; they sold a variety of items, from toiletries and food to ointments and pills, and were appealing to a paying customer who (at least in the cities) had a choice of establishments to patronise. Despite this, many succeeded in making an excellent living, and had a high standing within their communities. Broadly, they functioned as a medical “first-port-of-call” for many different social classes.[1]
Picture
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_patient_suffering_from_the_adverse_effects_of_strychnine_tr_Wellcome_L0034507.jpg

Background to the Middletons

​Whilst the Middleton family pedigree stretches back well into the sixteenth century it was during the mid eighteenth century that they first ventured north from the area around Darlington to Norhamshire.  The couple making the move circa 1756 was Jonathan Middleton baptised at Haughton-le-Skerne Dec 1726 and his wife Mary Hodgson the daughter of William and Jane Hodgson of Sellaby, Gainsford.  For a time they farmed at Norham Mains but connections with home must have been maintained as not only were their children baptised at Haughton-le Skerne but the couple were buried there in 1799 and 1803 respectively.  In her letters to GAS, Sarah Nicholson of Horncliffe (1842 – 1932), great granddaughter of Jonathan and Mary states that the Middleton family owned Denton but whether this is actually true has not been determined.  It does make an interesting point of discussion, however, as the Culley brothers, the famous agriculturalists who likewise moved to Northumberland, also hailed from Denton.  Matthew and George Culley born 1730 ad 1734 would have been contemporaries of Jonathan Middleton and undoubtedly known the family before taking the tenancy of Fenton near Wooler in 1767.[2] 
The Middleton pedigree is a complicated network of interwoven relationships which is difficult to follow at times.  The number of cousin marriages that occurred throughout the generations rivals and possibly even outstrips, that of the Nicholsons with whom along with other families they intermarried several times.  For the purposes of this post these complex twists and turns will be kept to an absolute minimum, but I do have the information here should anyone be interested in learning more.  
​Jonathan Middleton and Mary Hodgson had 10 known children, of which their third son Hodgson married ‘the beautiful Phyllis’ daughter of George Smith of Horncliffe and Norham East Mains.  Hodgson and Phyllis themselves had seven children, the youngest of which their daughter Phyllis married Robert Strickland, a schoolmaster at Middleton St George, at Darlington in 1841.  
Picture
​Robert and Phyllis had four sons, Robert b.1841, Oliver b.1844, Henry b.1846 and George Hodgson Strikland b. 1949. Robert the eldest died aged 11 in 1853.  The three remaining brothers joined an emerging group of people, including a few of their cousins who became ‘Chemists and Druggists’. In 1871 the brothers are living together above the retail premises on the east side of the High Street in Yarm.
Picture
Copyright The National Archives; Kew, London, England; 1871 England Census; Class: RG10; Piece: 4898; Folio: 56; Page: 4; GSU roll: 848008
Oliver and Henry are listed as Grocers and Chemists but youngest brother George is listed as a Pharmaceutical Chemist – a notable difference.  Also living with them are two apprentices, two servants and another visiting chemist by the name of Sanderson.  The ‘Chemist and Druggist’ was an occupation which truly emerged at the beginning of the 19th century in distinction to more the traditional Apothecary.  Chemists and Druggists  ‘dispensed compounded medicines made to published recipes and pre-packaged ‘patent’ medicines whose contents were secret… Chemist and druggists’ shops sprang up in cities and country towns. Some were scientifically competent, many were not’.[3]  In addition to medicines they also sold a variety of other ‘useful’ items including poisons.  The following evocative extract, written by Chris Chapman is taken from the Chemist and Druggist website by Chris Chapman who looks at the life of an apprentice in 1859.[4] (More on the website!)
t’s a typical store: large shelves are occupied by gleaming jars containing the ingredients of the druggist’s trade. Whale oil is nestled against containers filled with calomel and camphor, while jars hiding lavender, coriander seeds and balsam of Peru occupy the shelf above. The colour of each glass container hints at the contents: a ruddy cobalt hue suggests a syrup, while a mysterious green indicates a poison.

In a secluded counter, out of reach of patrons, is an ornate, sealed jar containing medicinal leeches, in case a patient needs bleeding.

The polished mahogany of the main shop is scrupulously clean from hours of attentive burnishing and all available surfaces are occupied by items for sale. Lemonade, marking ink, tobacco and bullets – sold as ‘sporting ammunition’ – are displayed, while some items are tucked behind the counter for security. The air is thick with the rich smell of ingredients drifting from the dispensary; although patent medicines are sold, these are mostly for lower class customers who cannot afford the druggist to prepare their treatment himself. There is no National Health Service, and no such thing as a free prescription.

The first customers arrive and are greeted by a smartly dressed young man, hair slicked with pomade. It’s a typical day, so the druggist’s apprentice has been at work since 7am. He won’t finish until at least 10pm, when he’ll get his week’s wages – 20 shillings, about £75 in today’s money.

Retreating to the dispensary, the apprentice presents the first prescription to his master, who studies it intently. There is no formal way of writing a prescription, and patients are often defined as “Mr Smith’s wife” or “Italian baby” rather than by name.
​

The first request is written, as usual, in the spidery hand of the local physician: “Tincturae jalaep, 3ss.; Magnesiae sulpatis, 3ij.; Infusi sennae, 2/3 iss.; misce fiat haustus cras manae sumendus.” The prescription is for a laxative, and relatively simple to decipher – ingredients and instructions are always written in Latin. Laxatives, or ‘purgatives’, are some of the most popular remedies sold in the shop as everyone knows they must be taken regularly to regulate the bowels. That said, everyone also ‘knows’ that diseases are caused by the foul-smelling miasma, or ‘bad air’ (Louis Pasteur will not publish his germ theory for another two years).
Picture
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_patient_suffering_adverse_effects_of_arsenic_treatment._Wellcome_L0034505.jpg
The apothecaries on the other hand had moved their focus away from retailing such medicines towards the treating of patients in the role of a general medical practitioner.  During the mid 19th century a certain rivalry began to develop between apothecaries, the high street ‘chemist and druggists’ and the newly emerging pharmaceutical chemist which would lead to the establishment and regulation of distinct, yet complementary professions.
Between the 1815 Apothecaries Act and the 1858 Medical Act, the practice of medicine became regulated in Britain. Apothecaries became subject to rules regarding training, licensing, and practice. Chemists and druggists were excluded from this licensing, but defined as a distinct profession with their own jurisdiction. Towards the middle of the century, they began pushing for their own regulatory body in order to prevent charges of quackery, and reinforce their medical status. This culminated in the founding of the Pharmaceutical Society in 1841. Schools were then set up to teach pharmacy, and the Pharmacy Acts of 1852 and 1868 helped to regulate the sale of pharmaceuticals, and create uniform standards of training and examination. However, not all chemists and druggists educated themselves in this way, and many continued to learn the ropes via apprenticeship until late in the nineteenth century.[5]
​The new legislation for Chemist Druggists and Pharmaceutical Chemists introduced both examinations and registration.  These new regulations created a paper trail which may be extremely useful to the family historian and many of the records are freely available online. 
1. ‘The Chemist and Druggist’ magazine has digitised its collection from the first edition in 1859 through to the discontinuation of the print edition in 2016 and is available through Archive.org.[6]  It is a veritable cornucopia of advertisements, business listings as well as the latest ‘medical’ innovations.  Only delve in here when you have a few hours to spare!

2.  Several editions of ‘The Registers of Pharmaceutical Chemist and Chemists and Druggists’ are also available online through Archive.org.  They list details as to the type and date of any examinations passed along with the number of their certificate.[7]  The extract below shows George Hodgson Strickland in the 1885 edition
Picture
Extract from 'The Registers of Pharmaceutical Chemist and Chemists and Druggists' 1885
and John Holt from the 1919 edition of the Register
Picture
Extract from 'The Registers of Pharmaceutical Chemist and Chemists and Druggists' 1919.

The Strickland Family & the ‘Strickland & Holt’ Legacy

​In June 1872 Oliver Strickland married his cousin Eliza Jane Waugh, the daughter of Margaret Middleton and Alexander Waugh, at York.  The couple went on to have three children Phyllis, Robert and Isabella Waugh Strickland in 1874, 1875, and 1878 respectively.  Oliver’s brother Henry Strickland married Hannah Margaret Hauxwell at Worsal Village in 1874.  Henry died just a few months later and the couple’s only child, Henrietta Margaret was born posthumously on 8th January 1875.  George Hodgson Middleton has not been located in either the 1891 or 1901 census, but in 1911 he was living at 29 Percy Street Middlesbrough where he died on 12th June 1913. He is listed as unmarried and a ‘smallware salesman’.  To date nothing is known about his life after 1881.
Picture
At some point in time as yet undetermined, Oliver Strickland went into partnership with John Holt and the business became known as ‘Strickland & Holt’.  Oliver died on 19th April 1884, it is ‘said’ from a bout of pneumonia he developed as result of rescuing livestock from the River Tees which had burst its banks.  (Rather topical given the devastating floods experienced in parts of Yorkshire recently.)  His wife Eliza and their daughters Phyllis and Isabella stayed on in Yarm and can be found living in the High Street in the 1891 census together with her widowed father-in-law Robert.   Eliza was listed as a Grocer and Chemist so it would seem that she continued to be involved in the business for sometime after her husband's death.  The official notification of the dissolution of the partnership appeared in the press in July 1896.  
Picture
Photograph of the original shopfront by kind permission of 'Strickland & Holt', Yarm.
​However, 'Strickland & Holt' is still operating today from the original premises in Yarm where it is now run by John Holt’s descendants.  ​Their website notes that ‘Today, his [Oliver’s] descendants live in Canada, but the connections and friendship between the two families is kept alive through correspondence and occasional visits.’   They, along with many other families descended from Hodgson Middleton and Phyllis Smith live on today with a goodly dose of Smith and Middleton genes between them! ​  Many are overseas, but there are the others who did not emigrate still living much closer to home.
​[1] Centre for the History of Medicine, Boston.  Apothecaries from the Eighteenth Century Onward: England.  
​https://collections.countway.harvard.edu/onview/exhibits/show/apothecary-jars/eighteenth-century-england
[2] Rowe, D. J. 'The Culleys, Northumberland Farmers, 1767-1813.' The Agricultural History Review, vol. 19, no. 2, 1971, pp. 156–174.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40273786?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
[3] Science Museum
 
http://broughttolife.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/people/chemists
[4] Chemist and Druggist Website https://www.chemistanddruggist.co.uk/content/day-life-victorian-pharmacist
​[5] Centre for the History of Medicine, Boston. Apothecaries from the Eighteenth Century Onward: England.  https://collections.countway.harvard.edu/onview/exhibits/show/apothecary-jars/eighteenth-century-england
​
[6] Chemist and Druggist Magazine online 
​
https://archive.org/details/chemistanddruggist
[7] The Registers of Pharmaceutical Chemist and Chemists and Druggists
​ https://archive.org/details/registersofpharm00pharuoft/page/n4
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    Author

    Susie Douglas

    Subscribe to Newsletter and Blog

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013

    Categories

    All

Picture Susie Douglas Qualified Genealogist Family Historian and Writer https://www.qualifiedgenealogists.org/profiles/douglas-susie
​Member of the Register of Qualified Genealogists (RQG)​
Associate Member of Association of Genealogists and Researchers in Archives (AGRA)
Picture
Member of Visit Scotland's Ancestral Welcome Scheme

​Copyright © 2013 Borders Ancestry
​Borders Ancestry is registered with the Information Commissioner's Office No ZA226102  
https://ico.org.uk.     Read our Privacy Policy
  • Home
    • Introduction
  • About
  • Services
    • Records available for consultation
    • Tours & Workshops
  • Blogs
    • "Bitesize" Blog >
      • Picks from the Past
    • Projects >
      • Berwick 900
      • One Place Study - Norham >
        • Norham Links
      • Kerchesters, Sprouston
  • Contact Us
    • Sign up to Newsletter
    • Power Hour & Workshop Enquiries
    • Privacy Policy
  • #AncestryHour